I highly appreciate decriminalization of adultery.
Adultery is more intense in countries in which adultery is a crime and in which adulterer & adulteress can be stoned to death without trial than in countries where it is not a crime.
The holier the customs the more extreme the adultery.
There was an illiterate man in our village. He used to say, " No food if we disobey women."
A second illiterate man in our village who lives on the daily wages of his wife says, " Dasoham".
A third illiterate man in our village says, " A woman wins however foolish she is; a man bows however wise he is."
A fourth illiterate man in our village says, " Aadi shakti".
An advocate of Khammam ( Telangana ) by name Potla Madhava Rao says, " Once marriage knot is made, all powers are wife's."
A woman brings an acre or two as dowry and in no time becomes the queen of the lands of her bridegroom; he's reduced to titular head.
What I mean by saying all these thigs is, laws are still made for the protection of women, the most powerful.
Even the judges of Supreme Court once admitted that they were tied to the apron strings of their wives.
Nevertheless Supreme Court gave us such a bold law. Words fail me to aptly appreciate their boldness.
Supreme Court thinks that henceforth woman is no more a commodity.
Women have never been a commodity in the history of the Earth, Men have, on the contrary, always been slaves.
Women won't rejoice because they're not commodity. Women don't rejoice because they got equal share in the properties of their parents.
They love to have equal share in husband's property. Immediately after marriage, she can claim her share and desert the husband. Why to cook food for the nasty fellow? Before marriage he was noble in her eyes.
As adultery is still a ground for divorce, the notion of commodity can't die. Adultery should be a ground for divorce as usual. Otherwise a woman will never s*xually entertain her husband, something characteristic.
Let her not. The husband can search for someone else. Unfortunately this's not easy for man. This trend must go.
Man pays for woman. Here woman doesn't cry equal rights.
Adultery shouldn't be a crime. If it should be, then adulteress should be made equally guilty.
Gender-biasedness has been playing havoc with the lives of men.
Woman are at disadvantage by this judge-made law.
Woman makes money. When she becomes unable to extract any more, she instigates her husband to prosecute thereby extracting the last paisa from his pocket thus making him a beggar. She can't cry rape because she consented.
Woman now is worried because her husband can't prosecute him. Man is saved. This will be in the interest of the society.
