Divith 22 June 2020
P. Venu (Advocate) 22 June 2020
No is the only answer. Facts posted suggest that no property was left intestate either by your grandfather or the grandmother.
Divith 22 June 2020
Thanks for the reply,yes nothing was left intestate.
But the fact is my mother is filed a partition suit and lawyer has assured we will get property-we are just paying money to lawyer.
Why do lawyers do like this i cant understand--we are just dreaming we will get anything
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 23 June 2020
The lawyer shall form his/her opinion, advise and proceed as per the inputs in the form of facts and documents provided by you, for which you are responsible.
If you are not satisfied with his/ her lyour lawyer's) performance, ability or behaviour you can (must) change immediately.
G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.) 23 June 2020
With due respect to your advocate, every advocate maintains professional ethics. None of the members have gone through documents and know more facts and to decide simply on the basis of some vague stories.
Your advocate might have studied the documents and he might have found a real cause of action. Members are not competent to judge on his abilities, when it is you that has explained the problem, convinced with his explanation and filed the suit.
P. Venu (Advocate) 23 June 2020
Originally posted by : Divith | ||
Thanks for the reply,yes nothing was left intestate.
What are the grounds urged in the partition suit? |
Divith 23 June 2020
Hi Experts thanks for all your comments.
The grounds argued in the partition suit is-The will executed by my grandfather is not correct-He has not divided the property equally to all three childrens-(2 females and 1 male my father)
The main point is the 2 females have already sold many properties,given to apartments and things have changed-will we still get them?
My point is IF ITS SELF EARNED PROPERTY ONE CAN GIVE IT TO ANY ONE HE WISHES RIGHT
Is there any law or chance that we can defeat this point?
Why cant lawyers say this so that we wont file case it self-ans this is the base?
But they still give assurances and say we can get the property-thats the point which am not able to understand.
Yes i can understand each lawyer can think and run the case differently but the point of judgement would be the same right that
IF ITS SELF EARNED PROPERTY ONE CAN GIVE IT TO ANY ONE HE WISHES RIGHT
Please advice
P. Venu (Advocate) 23 June 2020
Has the defendants files the written statement? What is their stand - what are the pleadings therein?
Divith 23 June 2020
Hi Sir,
Yes the defendants my 2 aunts have filed statements telling we have no rights to challange the will.
An order is also being done by the additional civil court but we have moved to high court again asking to challange the will.
WIll we get anything here?
ORDER IA.no.31 filed by the defendant no.9 Under Section 151 CPC is hereby allowed. Defendant no.1(a) to 1(c) and defendant no.7 are hereby directed to not to cross*xamine defendant no.5 or any other witness touching the validity of Will dated 31.10.1998. No order as to costs.
P. Venu (Advocate) 23 June 2020
The issue appears to be more complicated than the facts disclosed.
Divith 23 June 2020
Hi Sir,
What else details do you need-But the fact is that can we get the earned property from my grandfather?