LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

VISHNUMURTHY CHADALAWADA (.Executive Engineer)     17 December 2022

W.p as dismissed infructuous

Sir, I have filed OA no.4042 in APAdministrative  Tribunal  in the year 2006 as applicant ,Tribunal ordered in favour of applicant and ordered promotions on par with  his juniors ,the orders were complied by respondents( ENGINEER IN-CHIEF AND OTHERS, subsequently   in the above  case  the respondents filed a WP  as applicants/petitioners  to set aside the tribunal orders filed by vishnu Murthy.the hon'ble High court made orders as below:

Hon’ble High Court Telangana State THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.30547 of 2010 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners has informed the Court that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the 1st respondent has retired from service, thus rendering the present writ petition as infructuous. 2. In view of the same, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _________________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J ________________________________ K.SARATH, J Date: 02.09.2022 applicant in OA no.4042/2006  became respondent in  W.P. in the Hon'ble HC the above order in favour of petitioner or respondent(CH.VISHNU MURTHY) kindly reply  in detail for  which I shall be highly thankful to you.

ch vishnu murthy  



Learning

 1 Replies

P. Venu (Advocate)     17 December 2022

Admittedly, the OA has been decided in favour of the applicant and the respondents have complied with the directions.

As such, the query itself suggests to be sperfluous.

1 Like

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register