CRPC 125 Evidance recalling application

Repeated queries as observed from your profile at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/profile.asp?member_id=640333

posted a new topic in Forum CRPC 125 Evidance recalling application

posted a new topic in Forum CRPC 125 Evidance recalling application

posted a new topic in Forum speedy trial application in Trial Court or District judge.

posted a new topic in Forum Divorce jurisdiction

posted a new topic in Forum maintenance 125

posted a new topic in Forum CRPC 125 

posted a new topic in Forum Evidence CRPC 125

posted a new topic in Forum Evidence DV

posted a new topic in Forum Evidance Maintenance case 

It is absurd and ridiculous.
 

Dear Querist,

In the Rahul Labroo vs Priya on 24 March, 2015 case, the respondent-wife has filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for grant of the maintenance. So, certainly her evidence is essential for the just decision of the case. If due to mistake on the part of her counsel, she was not examined-in-chief as per the provisions of the law, her request to recall and examine herself in support of her petition cannot be declined as the recording of her statement is very essential to the just decision of the case, otherwise it will be a failure of justice.

In the case of Manish Tandon vs Ankita Bhutani on 23 May, 2017, The petitioner vehemently argues that a second petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable once the first petition has been dismissed as withdrawn without a specific permission to file afresh. 

Regards,

Palak