Guest (n/a) 17 February 2009
Abhishek (law student) 17 February 2009
The image of the judiciary will be considerably enhanced if the judges of the High Courts and Supreme Court publicly declare their assets and continue to file annual declaration of assets.
The reluctance of the judges of the High Courts and Supreme Court to publicly declare their assets will give rise to a lot of doubts in the minds of the public.
The moral authority of the the High Courts and Supreme Court judges gets eroded if they are perceived as being above the law and not subject to the same yardsticks as are applied to civil servants and ministers, who are obliged to declare their assets either at the time of their entry into civil service and at the time of contesting the elections. This simple norm should apply with equal force to the judges of the High Courts and Supreme Court.
The greatness of an institution lies in its ability to inspire confidence in the minds of the people. Legal skulduggery is no substitute for the trust of the people, and transparency is the hallmark of a modern state.
M. PIRAVI PERUMAL (Advocate & Consumer Rights) 17 February 2009
To advance the cause of transparency and probity in public life
In line with the requirement for all civil servants
It will be applauded as an act of statesmanship
New Delhi: Eminent citizens from various walks of life have appealed to Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan and judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts to voluntarily disclose their assets to advance the cause of transparency and probity in public life.
Code of conduct
In an appeal sent to the CJI and other judges the signatories pointed out that in 1997, while adopting the “Restatement of Judicial Values” (also called the code of conduct), the judges of the Supreme Court decided that each judge would declare his/her assets in confidence to the CJI. This was reiterated in 1999 in a conference of the Chief Justices. These resolutions were adopted in the light of a growing public perception that there was lack of accountability of the higher judiciary. This was also in line with the requirement of declaration of assets by all civil servants to the government.
Court’s rationale
The statement said: “The rationale given by the Supreme Court for the need for disclosure of assets of candidates contesting elections would equally apply to all public servants occupying crucial positions of authority. In any case, with the Right to Information Act, 2005, now in place, it is clear that the disclosure of assets by public servants to the government or to any other authority would be accessible to the citizens under the RTI Act. The exemption from disclosure under the RTI Act would not apply to disclosure of assets of public servants.
“Several eminent former judges and Chief Justices of the Supreme Court, including Justice Krishna Iyer and Justice J.S. Verma, have publicly expressed the view that it would be desirable for judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts to publicly declare their assets. By doing so, they would be setting an example of transparency in the country which would then be emulated by other public servants. Such voluntary disclosure of assets by judges [without resort to the RTI Act] would be applauded as an act of statesmanship by the people of this country, at a time when people have become cynical about the integrity of public servants. It would greatly advance the cause of transparency and probity in public life.
“We therefore call upon you to set an example for public servants by voluntarily making public your asset declaration.”
The signatories are: Admiral R.H. Tahiliani, former Chief of the Naval Staff and Director, Transparency International, India,; Aruna Roy, founder, MKSS and RTI and NREGA activist; Ramaswamy R. Iyer, former Secretary, Water Resources; Vikram Lal, Chairman, Common Cause; Madhu Bhaduri, former ambassador; Amit Bhaduri, Professor Emeritus, JNU; Anil Sadgopal, education activist and former Professor of Education, Delhi University; Jean Dreze, former Member, National Advisory Council; Vandana Shiva, education and agriculture activist; Trilochan Sastry, Professor and Dean, Academic, IIM-Bangalore; Yogendra Yadav, Professor, CSDS; Prashant Bhushan, convener, Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform; Arvind Kejriwal, Magsaysay awardee and RTI activist; N. Bhasker Rao, Chairman, Centre for Media Studies; Harsh Mandar, Director, Centre for Equity Studies; Ravi Chopra of the People’s Science Institute; Kamini Jaiswal, advocate, Supreme Court; Shabnam Hashmi of ANHAD; Mira Shiva, health activist; Kavita Srivastava, secretary, PUCL Rajasthan; Gautam Navlakha, human rights activist; Nikhil Dey of the National Campaign for People’s Right to Information; Arun Kumar, Professor of the JNU; and Dunu Roy, Director, Hazard Centre.
alokraman (company secretary ) 17 February 2009
This is a matter of public propierty and ethical values . Honourable JUDGES MUST SHOW that their act is also like judge
PALNITKAR V.V. (Lawyer) 17 February 2009
Yes, the judges must declare their assets.
Rathnakar P V (civil engineer) 17 February 2009
Yes, i do agree with the members.
In fact the people of this country lost all the hopes in the system,only exemption is JUDICIARY.Hence it is high time for the JUDICIARY to keep up their HOPE.