Hello,
A property was bought in 1910 (through sale deed) by our grand father's father and the property (about 8 acres) was in full enjoyment of our grand father after his father's death in the early 20's. Our mother is the only issue to our grand father. The ROR and RSR and UDR are in the name of our grand father. Our grand father left a Will in favour of the grand sons. After his death the Will came to effect. The property now under the enjoyment of us. In between one of the cousine brothers of our grand father included his name in the Natham adangal and disturbing our posession and enjoyment. Then we moved the revenue department for remedy and issued an order to cancel their patta. Without obeying the order, he wrote an inaam settlement to his grandson (minor). So, we filed a declation suit against them. He said the property was his ancestral property and divided into two parts, the second half was enjoyed by me. They had not produced any document to prove their statements. We hve produced enough records such as ROR, RSR, UDR and receipts of taxes, etc. Now the suit is dismissed because the sale deed (1910) is not proved the relevance of the suit property. The suit property is only about 100 cents. The sale deed is about 8 acres. They also said ROR and RSR are not the title documents.
Are there any authorities or judgements / laws to prove and strengthen the title deed,ROR, RSR and contunuos enjoyment over 100 years?
We are in the process of appeal. Please help us.
