LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Derogatory and Defomatory remarks by members of LCI

Page no : 2

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     19 January 2010

Dear Sathya Sir, you know that I dont mean that you should be banned, what I want to point out is that Admin should properly scrutunized matters and take action before banning any members. In this Country some issues are never brought to the notice of the general public, and if members of LCI post such matters in the forum should they be banned frm the forum without application of mind? We are learning many new things from this forum through the contributions of the members, and in spite of targeting those subjects matters if we target our members without proper application of mind on the subject matters, it wil not be proper to go on banning our members.

1 Like

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     20 January 2010

Respected Satya Prakash sir, your contributions are significant and informative, so, please review your decision, for the sake of people like us.

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     21 January 2010

Respected Members,

With due respect I am posting these quotes,

“Honest differences are often a healthy sign of progress.”

“Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes.”

“Hate the sin, love the sinner.”

Mahatma Gandhi


(Guest)

My Dear Sir,
Thats what I want if some authority has even the slightest MANHOOD... prosecute me...

But unfortunately... they are not committed to Satyamev Jayate
Jai Hind!

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     23 January 2010

mr assumi is more perfect and regadable in this matter 'before banning they should get a chance to explain'. thanks.

mr satya done no wrong by  posting the file - corruptions among the judges. most of the cases of that file known to us. you are a knowledgeable person and we got benificial by your several messages. if criticism is not there then it will be a statement of physicofancy.

 

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     23 January 2010

Sorry please read regardable instead of regadable

R.K.SUNDERRAJ (LAWYER HUBLI,KARNATAKA)     02 February 2010

I AGREE WITH ASSUMI SIR. an oppurtunity of being heard,principles of natural justice,should have been given,looking into the contribution  made by Satyaprakash sir. Mistakes may have happened, but it should be seen that weather it was deleberate one and then be decided.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register