Difference between sec 397crpc and sec 29 of dv act

Section 29 DV Act is a remedy in the form of an appeal whereas a revision petition is what is envisaged under section 397 crpc . Appeal can involve re appreciation of facts whereas in a revision petition, the court can only verify the trial court record to the extent of the legality of the jurisdiction exercised . 397(3) basically means that there shall lie no second appeal .

Section 29 DV Act is a remedy in the form of an appeal whereas a revision petition is what is envisaged under section 397 crpc . Appeal can involve re appreciation of facts whereas in a revision petition, the court can only verify the trial court record to the extent of the legality of the jurisdiction exercised . 397(3) basically means that there shall lie no second revision against an order passed in the first one .

Thanks Mr Chattergee!!

So, what I understood is

if a respondent wants to go in session court against order (of MM COURT in DV act case)

For Any interim relief / final judgment / any other order during trial  he should go Under Sec 29 of DV act.

And if respondent thinks there is any legal error in order he should go under 397crpc

Pls correct if I am wrong. 

And in which section respondent should move to HC if 397crpc or 29 of DV act gets dismissed in session court.