dv

Yes.
 

SIR,

THANKS FOR YOUR REPLY , BUT OTHER SIDE ADVOCATE IS REFERRING TARUN BATRA VS. BATRA'S CASE FOR MY CASE.

THAT MYSELF HAVE NO RIGHTS TO STAY IN THE PLACE OF FIL HOUSE. (WHERE MY HUBBY IS PRESENTLY STAYING NOW)

PLZ CLARIFY ME SIR.

ANY CITATIONS / JUDGEMENTS IN SUPPORT OF MY CASE.PLZ  BRING TO MY KNOWLEDGE.

MOREOVER HE IS SAYING THAT BEFORE SEPERATION WE BOTH STAYED IN RENTED HOUSE AWAY FORM FIL HOUSE. , SO HE IS MENTIONING THAT BEFORE SEPREATION WE STAYED IN RENTED HOUSE , SO YOU DONT HAVE RIGHTS TO STAY IN FIL HOUSE EVEN THOUGH YOUR HUBBY IS STAYING THERE.

PLZ CLARIFY ME SIR.

PLZ PLZ PLZ.

Batra's case also in favour of you because it says-

“ Share house hold” would only mean the house belonging to or taken on rent by husband or the house which belongs to joint family of which husband is member.

SIR,

WHAT YOU SAID IS RIGHT , BUT IN MY CASE , THE MATRIMONIAL HOUSE WHICH WAS NOT BELONG TO MY HUSBAND , ONLY HE IS STAYING THERE.THAT PROPERTY WAS MY FIL'S SELF ACQUIERD PROPERTY , OTHER SIDE ADVOCATE IS SAYING THAT WITHOUT MY FIL'S PERMISSION I HAVE NO RIGHTS TO  STAY THERE.

THEN IT WAS NOT THE JOINT PROPERTY WHICH MY HUSBAND WAS A MEMBER.

THEN HOW CAN I FURTHER PROCEED.

PLZ CLARIFY.