1.Can lower court take 3 months time in between holding of the testimony of a witness(plaintiff)in a DV and maintenance case thereby dividing it into two parts (as testimony could not be taken completely in one hearing due to shortage of time ?
2.Is not this an unusually big gap specially when court combined 3 cases ie DV,125 and execution proceedings for a single date?
3.As far as execution is concerned should not the court take less time even if it orders hearings of two cases after 3 months?
4.It seems something dishonest/wrong is happening and that is why juidiciary needs to be brought under scrutiny of independent institution.