LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

revribhav (Hindi)     01 October 2013

Forefeiture of provident fund:rti appeal

Appellate Authority(RTI)                                                               30.09.2013
NewIndia Assurance Co. Ltd,
87,M.G.Road,Fort, Mumbai-400001.
 
 
 
Re:  Appeal  underthe RighttoInformationAct-2005application2.08.2013
 
 
Incomplete and mischievousreply ofinsurance companyCPIO under CPI
cell/HO/2013-14/189 dated 03.09.2013*
 
 
Appeal:
 
The CPIO ,NIACL   furnished an evasive, distorted and mischievous reply consisting of two pages.
 
The applicant submits that he has been denied of his own Provident Fund which amounts to forefeiture of his provident fund.
 
The Head Office of the insurance company is bound to supply a speaking order to justify denial /forefeiture of the provident fund (own contribution ) of the applicant.
The appellant has never authorized any NIACL official to deduct from his Provident Fund a single rupee without his explicit consent.
 
 
The CPIO,be ordered to supply the complete,correct and transparent information of denial /forefeiture/deduction of provident fund of the applicant including the details of officials responsible for illegal and inhuman act.   
 
 
Thatallinformationisessentialtorighttolifeofa hapeless citizenofIndia,
 
 
Yourssincerely,
 
ShriGopalSoni, (appellant)                      revribhav@gmail.com
C231,PanchsheelNagar,Ajmer-305004            Tel.01452644106.
*enclosedwithannexure


Learning

 3 Replies

revribhav (Hindi)     01 October 2013

                                                      Forefeiture of Provident Fund: RTI appeal Inbox
rev ribhav <revribhav@yahoo.com> Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:18 AM
To: "gsrinivasan@newindia.co.in" <gsrinivasan@newindia.co.in>, "arsekar@newindia.co.in" <arsekar@newindia.co.in>, "pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in" <pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in>, "jsins-dfs@nic.in" <jsins-dfs@nic.in>, "jsba-dfs@nic.in" <jsba-dfs@nic.in>
Cc: "revribhav2@gmail.com" <revribhav2@gmail.com>, "revribhav@gmail.com" <revribhav@gmail.com>, "revribhav@yahoo.com" <revribhav@yahoo.com>
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
For information and necessary action Please:
1.Shri Anup Wadhawan,Joint Secretary(BA & P&I) Ministry of Finance
Department of Financial Services,Jeevan Deep Building,Parliament Street, New Delhi - 110 001
2.G. Srinivasan,CMD,New India Assurance Co. Ltd,87,M.G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001.
3. A.R. Sekar, GM, New India Assurance Co. Ltd,87,M.G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001.

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     01 October 2013

on bare reading of this applea the following things are gathered:-

 

(i) The applicant has a grievance on forefeitiure of PF.

(ii) The applicant wants to misuse RTI as greivance redreassal forum rather than seeking any information exsiting in material form

(iii) The applicant lacks coutesy in drafting.

(iv) The applicant has not cared to elaborate :-

  1. What information he sought.
  2. On what ground the information is denied
  3. Why such ground is not tenable
  4. What request he is making to the Appellate Authority

 

Such like applications are liable to be rejected (rather apeallate authoroity seems to have no choice)

revribhav (Hindi)     04 October 2013

an affected person u/s 4(1) of the RTI  Act

 

Prevention of Corruption Act:

Complainant or a person who is aggrieved on account of act or omission of public servant 

would fall within the definition of words "Any Victim".


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading