chandika prasad Mohanty 28 July 2020
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 29 July 2020
The Court shall not take cognizance in the absence of proper sanction.
However, if the court has taken cognizance challange it.
Presumably you are accused / counsel for accused, which you have concealed, otherwise what is your locus standi /concern /
Mastan 29 July 2020
An IO filed filed charge sheet U/sec 173(2) , in which he presented a doctored statement (suppressed & manipulated) to that of the 161 statements of PWs. This act has been done to save an accused from legal punishment.
Does this act attracts IPC sec 217 and 218? If so, then sanction from state u/sec 197crpc required to register FIR against the IO (S.I or C.I rank) or not?
P. Venu (Advocate) 29 July 2020
Mr. Mastan:
Please post your query in a different thread.
As regard the original query, what is the grounds relied on by the Trial Court to take cognizance in spite of the sanction refused by the Government? What are the offences charged?
राहुल भारत 31 July 2020
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 07 August 2020
please meet a lawyer with entire set of papers.
It is not clear as to for which section court took cognizance.
Anyone having any sympathy without you shall not be advising without knowing facts.