LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

madanamohanrao (individual)     10 August 2011

Import of sec 167 of ipc

i HAVE BEEN PAYING PROPERTY TAXES EVERY YEAR( for the last fifteen years) IN THE MONTH OF MARCH BY NON-NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS,  FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR.. HOWEVER,  ON THE INTERNET, I AM SHOWN AS A DEFAULTER AND CLAIMS  FOR PAYMENT OF TAXES WITH PENALTY ARE DISPLAYED WITH MONOTONOUS REGULARITY.  for instance, for the financial year 2011-2012, i pais taxes till 31 March 2012  I HAVE EVEN CONVEYED BY RECORDED DELIVERY DETAILS OF CHEQUES, THE DATES AND AMOUNT CREDITED TO THE ACCOUNT OF MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.

I AM DISGUSTED WITH THE INDIFFERENCE BY THE CORPORATION, WHICH MAINTAINS AN ACCOUNT DEPT AT PUBLIC EXPENSE.  THEY DO NOT SEEM TO REALISE THEIR OBLIGATION AND ADHERENCE TO THEIR PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY.  THEY (I MEAN THE HOD AND HIS UNDERLINGS) CONSIDER THEMSELVES AS MONARCHS AND TREAT US LIKE SUBJECTS SIMILAR TO THE ERSTWHILE BRITISH REGIME. (A CULTURE THAT PREVAILS EVEN AFTER OVER  60 YEARS OF INDEPENDANCE.)

MY QUESTION TO THE LEGAL LUMINARIES:              THE DEFAULTERS MEANING BILL COLLECTORS, FINANCIAL HEAD AND THE HEAD OF MUNICIPALITY  COULD BE severally  MADE LIABLE UNDER SEC 167 OF IPC FOR DELIBERATELY (in my opinion) falifying public records?

I SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADVISE WHETHER AN FIR IS APPROPRITE TO THE PS HAVING JURISDICTION.

 

 

 


 

 

 



Learning

 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading