Jithendra.H.J (Lawyer) 09 August 2009
Kiran Kumar (Lawyer) 10 August 2009
nothing bad in incorporating such a provision.
kranthi kiran (Works In Judicial Department) 10 August 2009
Definetly it needs amendment. By taking "conversion to Muslim" as an advantage, one shall not be allowed to indirectly violate the hindu law.
N.K.Assumi (Advocate) 18 August 2009
Dear Members, as far as Sarla Mudgal case is concerned it is in the matter of genuine conversion and not to escape from the law to enable the converted hindus to commit bigamy. If Hindu law is to be amended the expression any two hindus in section 5 has to be suitably amended in line with Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 of England: In section11 of the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1973, the expression employed therein section 11 " A marriage celebrated after 31st July 1973 shall be void on the following grounds only, that is to say (c) that the parties are not respectively male and female. Why not we have a clear statements of law inspite of introducing a fiction in that section 5 of the Act? Fiction in a sense, any two hindus mean only male and female?