1. Consultant of any type is a "free-lancer" and is entitled to receive a pre-determined fee and/or a retainership fee alongiwth appropriate conveyances and other incidentals.
2. A co. may engage a consultant for a specific job/purpose for a specific period / notice period on deciding a fee without the component of the term salary / DA/ PF / perks / paid leaves / yearly increments and so on. A consultant is not an employee and hence is not a workman under any law. The relation between a consultant and a company is a "consultant-client relationship" whereas the relation between a legal officer and a company is a "employee-company relationship".
3. The confusion is caused due to the designation as a "legal consultant" wherein actually it should be re-phrased to "legal officer", which now can be termed as a employee enjoying all the salary components alongiwth with perks, paid leaves and so on.
4. A legal consultant provides opinions / suggestions and does not have the jurisdiction to issue orders or implement them and is actually a service provider. Whereas a "legal officer", is the one who could implement the opinions / suggestions / directions and has complete jurisdiction to issue orders and officially compel others to implement his orders. A "legal consultant" by virtue of its title does not have the jurisdiction to appear in court on behalf of its clients whereas a legal officer can be deputed by the company via a BOD resolution to appear in courts on behalf of the company.
Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal