Yash 14 January 2017
Kumar Doab (FIN) 14 January 2017
There are limitations on cash withdrawals, nowadays.
If the funds belonged to you then ask her to return, first.
Suri.Sravan Kumar (senior) 15 January 2017
I agree with my brother P.S.Dhingra
Sachin (N.A) 15 January 2017
It shows your love for your wife, think that you have given wedding gift to your wife.
Sachin (N.A) 15 January 2017
But i like this idea, to avoid being harrassed by wife through false cases for money, better to open joint account with her.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 15 January 2017
No crime made
P. Venu (Advocate) 15 January 2017
Yes, there is no element of crime involved.
Kundan Kr. Singh (Advocate) 17 January 2017
don't worry ,she is your legally wedded wife,she can do
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 17 January 2017
Originally posted by : autohide4u | ||
Disagree with people who claim no crime committed. Deception (417/420), breach of trust (406), perhaps conspiracy (120B) are applicable. You just need to weave the story properly to attract these seYou just need to weave the story properly to attract these sections.
It is against the decorum of this forum to tell someone to weave a story. He should rely upon the tgruth |
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 17 January 2017
Mr Yash.
You are not living in taliban state.
@ Autohide4u,
The question is, where is the cause of suppositions to be made by the members, when the author has asked merely about the section, if any applicable, if her wife had withdrawbn the whole amount from a joint account, when his question is merely a fabricated story, as no bank allows withdrawl of whole amount unless the account is applied to be closed by the joint holders by making a joint application? In fact, it would have been a matter of common sense for the author of the question.
Further, even if there be any slighest truth in his story, why the members should unduly try to give unwarranted advice or feedback merely to the provocation of the author and even the unconcerned readers, when no case history is provided and the reason given for asking such a vague question?
He has not even cared to reply my query so far as to what he would do with the section of law, if informed.
So, why should not we restrict our replies or advice as per the spirit of the question?
@Autohide4u,