Just two months after a newly redeveloped building was completed, it suddenly collapsed, causing significant damage. While, thankfully, no one was hurt, the collapse destroyed some neighboring properties and also blew away the roofs and belongings of nearby huts that had been built illegally. The building owners had followed all the redevelopment guidelines, and the contractor hired was reputable, yet the collapse raised suspicions of negligence. Now, the neighboring property owners are preparing to file a lawsuit against the building’s owners and contractors, arguing that such a collapse wouldn’t have occurred unless there was some negligence during the construction. On top of that, the people living in the illegally constructed huts are also demanding compensation, claiming that the collapse has ruined their homes and livelihoods. Even though their structures weren’t legal, they’re still seeking some form of relief. The entire community, including us, is caught in a difficult situation—dealing with both the potential legal consequences and the moral dilemma of how to address the compensation claims of those living in the illegal huts. Will the building owner or contractor be liable? If yes, then how can we prove it?
