I deeply respect adv. Archana and read her advices with full attention. My response also dispose off the querry raised by dear Mr. Arun and the enquirer.
If the enquirer wants to throw a punch and does not want to hurt the opponent, I do not know such shadow fighting technique. But going through his further responses on the subject, I got a doubt that he wants to harm his father more than warranted in the given situation by throwing him out of job and snatching 50 to 75% of his salary. The only three grievances are that (1) he has illicit relationship with two other ladies (2) he may occupy the house, if both mother and son go away to U.K. (3) he may not incur the educational expenses. Now, for these three problems, where is the solution? Either it is S.125 Cr.P.C. or some provisions in Domestic Violence Act (DV). I totally agree with Adv. Archana that Section 125 cannot be invoked for the reasons, she herself well explained. That leaves us with problems and finding solutions. I reiterate DV for the following reasons:
1. It is not a draconian law, as projected by some people.
2. By invoking DV by the aggrieved wife, the husband does not acquire right to file divorce case. Especially on the ground that wife filed DV case, husband cannot get divorce.
3. If the husband is interested to file Divorce case, any way, he will file it and no body can stop him. If the wife leaves the option of filing DV case with a fear that it would provoke the husband for divorce case, and choses to file S. 125 (not possible because he is already paying 15 k) or S.18 HAMA (not possible for the same reason), then also pretending as aggrieved, the husband can file divorce. Hence, if the wife files any case, that will be an excuse for the husband to file divorce. If you do not want such situation, live with your problems and stay cool.
4. For the problems faced by the enquirer, the appropriate relief to some extent is available in DV Act. In DV Act, the pleadings are prescribed. If the wife does not want to wash the dirty linen in public, she has to just mark a tick in the prescribed proforma (Form II) in 3 (ii) & (iv), which includes relief of residence and school fees to the son. Even in the DIR report also (Form I), she can describe the incidents of domestic violence to the mere point that the husband has illicit relationship with the two ladies (4th point). That amounts to s*xual violence and she is entitled to invoke DV Act.
Why D.V. Act is preferable to S.125, there are several reasons:
First of all it is not a draconian Act. The procedure is simple. the proforma is prescribed one. Hence, exhaustive pleadings criticising / abusing / attacking the respondent can be avoided. the procedure and summoning process is simple. In extreme conditions, exparte interim relief can be obtained. As a huge case of law precedents are not there, even in appellate stage, the matter can be disposed off. the execution procedure is also simple.