Order after order

I shall add one more question.

5) What is meant for adjourned for evidence. If Magistrate puts the matter for evidence, can he still pass order on applications by Complainants ?

1. If upon receipt of an application from the aggrieved person, the Magistrate is satisfied that the circumstances so require, he may alter, modify or revoke an order after recording the reasons in writing, 2.Absolutely there is no bar. 3. You are suppose to adduce evidence from your side you have failed so order was confirmed by  Magistrate.

Attending the court late by 5 minutes cannot be claimed as an excuse for an adverse order against the party.  The orders if passed against the respondent shall have a relief only in revision in higher court and not in the same court.  Therefore it is not understood that how the trial court has accepted a petition to review its decision and the same was pending for one year.  Whether you are making the points clear or missing out any statements in between is also not known. Also, once a court has passed an order for payment of interim maintenance, it becomes the duty of the person to pay the same against whom the orders were passed. Further, as the case is going on, she is entitled to claim maintenance from the date of order or from the date of application as the orders specify along with the arrears as on this date. 

You can clarify all these issues with your own advocate who will be a better person to explain the position and circumstances of the case. 

Dear Sir,

As said earlier first order was passed dispossing off interim application.

Then court entertained a fresh application of the Complainant on same reliefs and passed order in absence of respondent.

Then respondent applied for stay of the order.

The court asked say of other party on the application of the respondent for stay

Then when respondent raised contention that initially order was passed to dispose off the application then this court has no jurisdiction to entertain order.

Court realized this and asked parties to lead their evidence. i.e noted in roznama "adjourned for evidence" on three dates.

However later court passed order that the order passed second time has to be exeuted and  application for stay is nomaintenable.

Now we have challenged and  the oder in session court for stay on above ground that once the order is disposed off it should not be re-orderd.

What are our chances?

Is ther any citation?