Passing of remark on high court's judicial poecedure in jmfc

It is not.

As such there is nothing wrong in the given statements. What is your query. Mr. HARIOM.

Sir Siddarth

Actually JMFC is lower Court than High Court

And in JMFC mentioning that the Complainnat was tactfully delaying proceedings in High Court shows inabilty of High Court

And Furtehr in JMFC mentioning that High Court wantedto pass Interim Order but the Complainant has stopped it in passing Interim Order is raising question on High Court's authority and its ability because High Court never mentioned any such remarks in its daily order (order of proceedings) .

In my opinion this is lowering dignity of High Court

PLEASE GUIDE

HARIOM

All the three points in the Query are no interference.      So, according to Section 13 (a) of Contempt of Courts act, no sentence to be awarded.

Section 5:-    The criticism is unpublished.

                     The criticism is fair and bona fide.