My common sense says you can’t initiate proceedings under negotiable instrument act if part payment is made even before presenting the cheque but as far as some high courts concern I am cite some authorities for you who permit Drawee to present and prosecute drawer for unpaid amount.:-
* Section 138 - Cheque issued for Rs.10,000/- towards part payment out of a liability of Rs.44117/- Thereafter draft for Rs.5500/- paid - Cheque presented and dishonoured - Complaint filed - Thereafter cash amount of Rs.5,000/- made - Held, even after the adjustment of these two amounts, still the accused is liable to pay nearly an amount of Rs.34,000/- Hence, as long as there is legally enforceable liability either on the date of issuance of the cheque or on the date of encashment of the cheque, the complainant is entitled to encash the cheque issued by the accused - Order of acquittal passed by Magistrate set aside. (Padmaja Marketing Enterprises Vs V.S.R.Murthy) 1998(2) CIVIL COURT CASES 684 (A.P.) : 1998 ISJ (BANKING) 0412 : 1997 (4) ALL INDIA CRIMINAL LR (A.P.) 0284 : 1998 (3) RCR (CRL.) 0034 : 1997 (4) CRIMES 0106 : 1998 CRL. L.J. 0881 : 1997 (2) ALT (CRL.) 0245 : 1997 (1) ALD (CRL.) 0814 : 1998 (36) BANK LJ 0077 : 1997 (2) LS AP 0020
*Section 138 - Offer to make payment - Held, once the offence is committed and merely by making the payment will not put an end to the same - It may effect the gravity of the offence. (Balwinder Singh VS Punjab and Sind Bank) 1998(3) CIVIL COURT CASES 408 (P&H) : 1998 ISJ (BANKING) 0647 : 2000 (1) ALL INDIA CRIMINAL LR (P&H) 0399 : 1999 (4) RCR (CRL.) 0380
*Section 138 - Part payment made - Is of no avail to the drawer of the cheque for evading prosecution. (Vandana Jain Vs Chief Judicial Magistrate) 1998(1) CIVIL COURT CASES 476(All.)