In one case I am a counsel of Accused ( case under section 138 of N.I. Act)
In that particular case the complainant was examined in chief ande thereaftrer cross examined by me in details. During cross examination I have asked more than 100 questions and able to rebut the presumtion. Now the complainant's advocate after completion of cross filed an application under section 138 of Evidence Act for reexamination of witness :
The petition runs as follows : -
During the marathone cross examination the complainant was asked several question but was not allowed to clarify the answer . and there might be some ambiguity occured during cross examination as such for clarfication of those ambiguities the reexamination of the complainant is imp.
The complainant advocate did not made any form of question as to on which question he wants to clarify according to him it is not necessary to make form of question and he can ask clarification on all the 100 question asked at the time of cross examination.
Is if feasible. I think there should besome form of question.
Advise me urgenty with certain judgements.
