manish agrawal 01 April 2017
Nitish Banka (lawyer) 01 April 2017
Go for quashing in HC on basis of compromise under 482 CrPC to close the case.
Adv. Nitish Banka
Dr. Atul [9013898936] (Lawyer, Scholar) 01 April 2017
Originally posted by : Nitish Banka | ||
Go for quashing in HC on basis of compromise under 482 CrPC to close the case. Adv. Nitish Banka Advocate Supreme court |
Lol, why would he institute quashing???? As in, if his property has been recovered, let the law take it's own course - let the prosecution bother about the case now. Or if you (the querist) are feeling large hearted, let the case break of its own, why waste your money on a 482 for a crooks' actions.
Rohit Krishan Naagpal (Advocate) 18 June 2017
You are only a complianant in the matter as the theft case is state case , you will be called for depostion before the court as when the Ld MM summons you for your examination so wait for summons .
You can change lawyer anytime.
If you want to keep a track of the matter and pursue the matter then hire an advocate who can be present on all dates of hearings of the case.
best of luck