LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Nilesh (N.A.)     11 April 2014

Regarding maternity leave

Hi,

My wife is employed with a Software/IT consulting services.
She has applied for the maternity leave and communicated the same to the employer well before taking the leave.

The employer has approved the leaves. Now the employer is reluctant to credit the salary. The employer is asking to join the office after the leave is completed (3 months) and then only they will provide the salary - which was not communicated to my wife before going on leave. 
We expected to get the salary on regular (monthly) basis. She is working with the employer for more than 80 working days. And also submitted the maternity related documents to employer.
 

Could you please advise us what steps we can take in such case? Which institution we can contact to get employer pay our salary?

--
Thank you.



Learning

 11 Replies

Dr J C Vashista (Advocate)     12 April 2014

Contact/engage a local lawyer, issue notice for payment of salary and wait for availing leave.

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     12 April 2014

no other way                                  

Kumar Doab (FIN)     12 April 2014

The conduct of employer is grossly wrong, illegal, unlawful, and can be deemed as offence.

She may record all such transactions (audio/visual)  during which payment of wages is being denied.

 

The employee has fulfilled his part of obligation: informed about pregnancy, submitted leave application for approval, proceeded on leave after approval…………………….

By a gentle communication in writing under proper acknowledgment the pregnant woman employee may submit to Manager-Finance, HR Head, appointing authority, MD that on dated……………………Mr/Ms…………………..designation…………………dept………………………..name of company …………………address……………………………has stated during discussion in person/by phone (mention phone numbers, time) that Maternity Benefit, salary for the period from dated………….to dated…………….shall be released to employee only after joining duty after pregnancy delivery and not until the employee joins duty. She may mention financial hardships being faced and demand to supply her the wages, reimbursements etc immediately by bank DD only thru redg. Post only.

 

Maternity Benefit Act: The Maternity Benefit preceding date of delivery (6weeks) has to be supplied in advance, on supply of information/proof of pregnancy, and for after delivery (6weeks) has to be supplied within 48 hours  on supplying information/proof of delivery of child.

The employee is also eligible for another 1 month leave after delivery for sickness due to pregnancy delivery, under Maternity Benefit Act., and also Maternity Bonus which was last as Rs.3500/-.

There is provision for penalty, punishment, imprisonment for violations……………..

You may refer to Sec:6,8(5),10,21

 The employee can lodge a complaint the moment payment of her/his wages are delayed even for a day…………………………….to Inspector under Payment of Wages Act, Inspector under (Name of your state) Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, and employer can be penalized say Rs.7500/instance………………

In her case the lady can also lodge an additional complaint with Inspector under Maternity Benefit Act ( state or central as the case may be in her matter) and O/o Labor Commissioner. The local O/o Labor Commissioner can guide her.

She can also lodge complaint with IT/ITeS women employees association:

https://ithiworld.wikispaces.com/News+Update

 

IT/ITeS  employees association:

 

http://www.itecentre.co.in/

https://ithiworld.wikispaces.com/News+Update

IT/BPO Voice of India | Facebook

UNITES Professionals

www.unitespro.org

https://www.wbitsa.org/

www.itpfindia.org/

https://itnitesunion.wordpress.com/author/itnitesunion/

 

 

Shiv Mahiti Ani Tantradyan Sena(Shiv IT SENA)

mankar.janardan@gmail.com


https://www.shivsena.org

 

 

 

https://www.amrc.org.hk/node/1088         CBPOP

https://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Indian-Journal-Industrial-Relations/185430721.html

https://bpo.knowledgehills.com/Directory/BPO-Jobs/CBPOP-Centre-for-BPO-Professionals.aspx

 

 

 

https://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-shiv-sena-forms-first-union-in-information-technology-sector-1465435

Trade unions that have embraced the IT/ITeS employees association: CITU, INTUC, BMS, AITUC, SHIV SENA etc.......                  

They won’t miss this meritorious opportunity.

 

You shall see the HR personnel/employer himself running with salary in their hands, their tales lifted, to give it to the employee…………………………

She can of course approach lawyer /law firm too. Her lawyer may opine that she can treat unpaid wages as debt and proceed accordingly, and also lodge complaint u/s 406,420……………..

 

There are many threads on Maternity Benefit Act that you may fins relevant e.g;

 

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Resignation-after-maternity-leave-79271.asp#.UahsGdKAqWN

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Maternity-act-74586.asp#.UXPE3qKAqWM

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Forced-to-resign-when-enquired-about-maternity-leaves-75754.asp#.UXPC0qKAqWM

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Maternity-leave-salary-76258.asp#.UXPDG6KAqWM

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Meternity-leave-75127.asp#.UXPEpaKAqWM

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     13 April 2014

You may follow the suggestions made by expert Mr. Kumar Doab in this aspect. The Employer's attitude of refusing to pay salary during the leave period is illegal and baseless.  Also you may contact a local advocate for further proceedings in this respect.

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     14 April 2014

well elaborated by Mr Kumar Doab

Suneet Gupta (www.vashiadvocates.com)     16 April 2014

The legal position has been well explained above by Adv. Doab and the other lawyers. However, there is a small issue of propriety in this case, and as officers of the court we need to see what is just and proper rather than solely the legal position.

As per your information:

  • Your wife worked for only ~3 months before going on sick leave - this implies that she was pregnant when she joined the organization
  • Was this fact communicated to the organization before joining - many organizations (including some government ones) only allow pregnant ladies to join after delivery
  • Your wife wants 3 months of paid leave after working only three months - this prima facie appears to be unjust for the employer
  • The employer is ready to credit the pay after your wife rejoins - I believe there is a genuine concern here that your wife might not join back after leave, thereby making him pay twice the salary for effectively only 3 months of work  (most of which must have gone in training)
  • Additionally the employer can claim that she was still a temporary employee and that temporary employees are not given paid maternity leave (this has been held to be valid by the courts)

Please understand that the labour laws are for genuine welfare of the labour and misuse by self serving parties (like you appear in this case) brings a black name to all. If your case is genuine, then I am not able to understand why you cannot wait for 03 months before your wife rejoins duty to get her salary arrears. In any case, any legal action will take much longer than that.

Suneet Gupta (www.vashiadvocates.com)     16 April 2014

The legal position has been well explained above by Adv. Doab and the other lawyers. However, there is a small issue of propriety in this case, and as officers of the court we need to see what is just and proper rather than solely the legal position.

As per your information:

  • Your wife worked for only ~3 months before going on sick leave - this implies that she was pregnant when she joined the organization
  • Was this fact communicated to the organization before joining - many organizations (including some government ones) only allow pregnant ladies to join after delivery
  • Your wife wants 3 months of paid leave after working only three months - this prima facie appears to be unjust for the employer
  • The employer is ready to credit the pay after your wife rejoins - I believe there is a genuine concern here that your wife might not join back after leave, thereby making him pay twice the salary for effectively only 3 months of work  (most of which must have gone in training)
  • Additionally the employer can claim that she was still a temporary employee and that temporary employees are not given paid maternity leave (this has been held to be valid by the courts)

Please understand that the labour laws are for genuine welfare of the labour and misuse by self serving parties (like you appear in this case) brings a black name to all. If your case is genuine, then I am not able to understand why you cannot wait for 03 months before your wife rejoins duty to get her salary arrears. In any case, any legal action will take much longer than that.

Nilesh (N.A.)     17 April 2014

Thank you to all of you for looking into the query and advice.

1. My wife has been working with this organization since June 2013 and asked for the maternity leave in Feb 2014 (8th month of pregnancy) So it was MORE than 80days of working (the minimum required).         2. She was not pregnant when joining the organization.                                                                                             3. The employer said they will pay the CTC per month during the leave - we have a written email communication from employer. And now they are denying to pay per month - should there be any reason? 4. I will re-confirm the fact if the employer is still considering her as a temporary employee (after working for 9 months).                                                                                                                                                                       5. If the employee is advised to extend the leave by a doctor- that should be a genuine case.

Please advise.

Thank you.

Suneet Gupta (www.vashiadvocates.com)     17 April 2014

If she has been working there for almost an year, then a request for 3 months maternity leave is reasonable. However, just confirm whether she was a permanent or temporary employee.

As regards extension of leave, I am not sure there are many medical grounds that require extension of leave for more than 2 months after delivery. However, many ladies extend the leave because of social and family reasons and because the baby is small. This can cause employers to be cautious.

In your case, if your wife joins after 03 months then she should get her pay arrears. In any case if you try to pursue the case legally, then it will take much more than 03 months. It will also make it difficult for her to get extended leave or to resume work with employers she has dragged to court.

While the legal position might be favouring you, the laws are more useful for blue-collar and unionized labour where you can get away with cursing your boss. In the IT and white collar jobs, It is advisable to maintain cordial relations with your employers rather than fighting with them.

Kumar Doab (FIN)     18 April 2014

MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961

(No. 53 of 1961)

3. Definitions :(o) “woman” means a woman employed, whether directly or through any agency, for wages in any establishment.

 

{ The Act does not differentiate between casual, permanent or temporary female employees.

Supreme Court of India: Municipal Corporation of Delhi versus Female Workers (Muster Roll) and Another

https://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/808569/?type=print

 

…………………. Act is also applicable to casual workers and daily wage workers………….

Madras high Court: L Kannaki versus The Secretary to Government Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/16105326/?type=print

 

…………………… pursuant to Section 5(2) of the Act, female employees who have rendered more than 80 days of service during 12 months preceding the date of expected child delivery are entitled to 12 weeks of maternity leave with wages…………}

 

15. Powers and duties of Inspectors: (c) require the employer to give information regarding the names and addresses of women employed, payments made to them, and applications or notices received form them under this Act; and

 

Then establishment has to submit annual Return in Form ‘K’ has to be submitted on or before 31st January of every year.

80 days employment is enshrined in the Act and the lady has worked for 80days and is eligible.

There is no criterion of being permanent or temporary employee.

 

Employer can offer superior benefits as provided for in the Maternity Benefit Act and can not offer inferior benefits.

Maternity Benefit might be a part of standing orders of the establishment.

Maternity Benefit is provided for Shops and Commercial Establishments Act of the state and this Act is applicable to  IT/ITeS companies.

 

Pregnancy is not a disease. Pregnancy is not an illness (and it is not permanent cause. so, rejection is not question....) and you do not suddenly become less capable of doing your job.

Pregnancy is not a medical condition leading to rejection.

 

Pregnancy discrimination in the workplace should be avoided by employer and its attorney say HR personnel as the repercussions can be serious. The women cell, NGO’s etc do not view such matters kindly.

Pregnancy discrimination is prohibited by law.

Women have been given equality.

 

 Employers must not refuse to hire pregnant women………………………… Exceptions if only shall apply to some employers

 

Employers should not refuse to promote, or fire a pregnant employee because of pregnancy.

  

You have email confirmation from employer himself/designated personnel of employer. Even if email was not sent the wages are to be paid on usual pay day. Even if these are delayed by a verbal communication it is violation. The Maternity benefit is to be paid by employer on its own in time frame prescribed in Act. The provisions of penalty, punishment, scope of imprisonment are stated in the Act. If employer or its personnel in line management, HR etc………….resort to coercion, intimidation, and do not pay wages it shall their doing to complicate the matters. Employer shall not offer his head and shall rather push its HR personnel, even legal cell personnel in the front. So these personnel in HR/Line Management should also mind their interest.

The employees should apply rapport, goodwill and apply exceptional levels of persuasion, persistence, negotiation, reasoning skills. These skills can be acquired. Any situation can be resolved skillfully including the one that is posted by you in this thread.

The HR personnel/Line Managers/legal cell personnel are also applying their skills on a pregnant lady (your wife).They have not declined in writing, to pay wages till she resumes her duty. If they are worth their salt they won’t state so in writing! You must record all calls, visits, and keep witness in whose presence call was attended for use in required at appropriate time in appropriate forum.

A smart employee is enough. 

IT/ITeS female employees have also formed union and have done a good job too. There are other unions of IT/ITeS employees.All of these are being embraced by Trade Unions e.g. INTUC, CITU, AITUC, BMS etc…………..

Unions do not imply shouting slogans only…………………………..

Are you aware that White Collared employees in other sectors are also united and they defend their rights?

Being union member does not mean one shall become or one shall have to be rude, rough, rowdy…………………By forming unions/Becoming union member one becomes properly informed.

 

It is not mandatory that employee should file a written complaint and appear in person before a lawful authority. In such matters the labor authorities have to act on even anonymous complaints, take Suo Motu notice……………….  

 

It is not necessary that a pregnant women may not resume duty after pregnancy delivery or may contract illness due to pregnancy delivery or may require leave due to family issues and to care for new born.

Women employee may require it too.

Many employers in IT/ITeS offer support to work from home and even 'Innovative Leave'...................

Just look around and you shall find many.

The HR has well defined role and responsibilities in an organisation and one of it is to not to resort to unfair and bad practices.It shall earn bad reputation, publicity  and employer may be branded as Violator of law and rights. 

The HR of your organisation can bee easily termed as unfit and under performer.

It is only acting as per its illusions.

AS far as you are concerned 'Don't give up your rights'.

 

 

 

 

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     21 April 2014

well elborated by Mr Kumar Doab


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register