LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

reversion of govt employees without their fault

Page no : 2

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     08 August 2019

Originally posted by : Sanjib Paul
And no action has taken against any officers who issued this so called unauthrized letter

 

You arre at the most entitled to a relief that the reversion is without SCN by the authority higher than appointing authority.

Sanjib Paul   17 August 2019

Board has issued another letter to face the legal cases across the country that all cases merged and should be heard in CAT principal bench

Sanjib Paul   17 August 2019

Madras high court ordered stay until final outcome of case

Sanjib Paul   17 August 2019

Calcutta CAT ordered department to dispose our representation and untill then no coercive steps should not be raken

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     18 August 2019

why are you giving facts on instalement basis and yet expecting to get correct advise.  It is now you are  revealing that the reversion has been challnged as well.

 

what are other facts.

Sanjib Paul   18 August 2019

Whatever is happening I just inform you and other experts. Through out India no where till date reversion happen but board is strict to their view of withdrawal of promotions letter. Various CAT passed order that board is written to take corrective measure after withdrawing unauthorized letter issued from board during 2017. We the applicant apprehend reversion as our promotions eligibility etc were governed by those letters. In this situation CAT ordered that based on apprehension court does not carry hearing. So the caae dispose off by giving instructions that representaion of applicant may be disposed and untill then no coercive stepson should not be taken. Donot know how to fight against it.

Sanjib Paul   18 August 2019

Through out India almost 8000 exective assistant inapectors and steno under CBIC will be affected

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     18 August 2019

Still the fats are not clear.

 

  1. whether promotion was legal (i) by competent authority, (ii) on existing vacancy (iii) vacancy not beloging to other mode of recruitment (iv) not in violation of reservation policy (v) DPC constituted as per RR, (vi) all candidate meeting QR as per RR, (vii) not violative of senioirty, (viii) no selected candidate under penalty or lacking vigilance clearance, etc]
  2. whether any SCN issued before revertion.
  3. what directions were from CAT.

Sanjib Paul   18 August 2019

CAT directed not to take coercive steps against applicant untill their representation disposed off and CAT didnot consider merit of the case.

Sanjib Paul   18 August 2019

Scn not issued yet as review dpc still not conducted

Sanjib Paul   18 August 2019

1. Board has issued letter to allow promotion and cadre control of different region constituted dpc and dpc give us promotion looking Qualification of sercice and vigilance clearence also considered

Sanjib Paul   18 August 2019

Vacancy arises considering boards letter which is later stated unauthorised

Sanjib Paul   18 August 2019

Reservation also fullfilled

Sanjib Paul   18 August 2019

RR was loosen by the board in that letter

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     18 August 2019

very cryptic descripttion not describing the problem in one go.

 

Better meet a layer in his office with all papers.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register