Review application of im in crpc 125 dismissed uo 47 cpc 114

I filed review application u/o 47 CPC 114 but judge denied to accept it. I think it was a typo from your side probably you want to say I need to file under CRPC 127 ? 

Originally posted by : SHIRISH PAWAR, 7738990900
	Dear sir,Maintenance u/s 125 are criminal poceedings so crpc will be applicable. You have to file revision under crpc.Regards,

Sir, filing a revision application will be a simple application with subject as revision application to review or recall order or do I need to submit this application u/s CRPC 127 ? As such there are no change in circumstances in my case and situation. Pls revert

I disagree with expert Mr. Shishir Pawar, review is applicable u/o XLVII Section 114 CPC in an order passed in Section 125 Cr PC.

When there are no change in circumstances application u/s 127 Cr PC is not maintainable and bound to be dismissed.

Move in appeal u/.s 19 Family Courts Act, 1986 if the order has been passed by Judge Family Court.

It is advisable to consult a local senior for better appreciation of impugned order on interim maintenance and proper guidance.

Originally posted by : Dr J C Vashista
	I disagree with expert Mr. Shishir Pawar, review is applicable u/o XLVII Section 114 CPC in an order passed in Section 125 Cr PC. When there are no change in circumstances application u/s 127 Cr PC is not maintainable and bound to be dismissed. Move in appeal u/.s 19 Family Courts Act, 1986 if the order has been passed by Judge Family Court. It is advisable to consult a local senior for better appreciation of impugned order on interim maintenance and proper guidance.

Sir, I filed review application u/o 47 and CPC 114 but judge denied to accept it.

so my lawyer filed a new petition u/s crpc 127 to review the order , but there is no change of circumstances in my case, its only judge has ignored the facts of my case during interim arguments and fix the interim maintenance . My purpose is to reduce the quantum of IM by requesting judge to review its passed order .

Please suggest the option of crpc 127 took by my lawyer is correct and admissible ? Op part has not given written reply to our crpc 127 and asked judge that they will go for verbal arguments directly and my date is fix on 18 March 2021, please suggest 
 

Originally posted by : Dr J C Vashista
	I disagree with expert Mr. Shishir Pawar, review is applicable u/o XLVII Section 114 CPC in an order passed in Section 125 Cr PC. When there are no change in circumstances application u/s 127 Cr PC is not maintainable and bound to be dismissed. Move in appeal u/.s 19 Family Courts Act, 1986 if the order has been passed by Judge Family Court. It is advisable to consult a local senior for better appreciation of impugned order on interim maintenance and proper guidance.

Sir, I filed review application u/o 47 and CPC 114 but judge denied to accept it. so my lawyer filed a new petition u/s crpc 127 to review the order , but there is no change of circumstances in my case, its only judge has ignored the facts of my case during interim arguments and fix the interim maintenance . My purpose is to reduce the quantum of IM by requesting judge to review its passed order . Please suggest the option of crpc 127 took by my lawyer is correct and admissible ? Op part has not given written reply to our crpc 127 and asked judge that they will go for verbal arguments directly and my date is fix on 18 March 2021, please suggest