Madame Aishwarya,
You don’t seem to have a clear and wholesome picture of the present day Indian women (erring wives), matrimonial laws, the judges and the advocates. Yours is case of a “frog in the well”. Whatever you thought it may not be more than 2% of the entire ocean of bad happenings in the matrimonial courts which are guided by Judges’ pro-women, whimsical misinterpretations and decisions and also worn out laws.
Even a learned counsel Sri Prabhakar, has jaundiced eyes with which he can see only yellow colour, not any other colours.
Hats off to Arunkumar, Swatirswatir and the legal fighter. At least to a “some extent” they have unveiled the truth about the prevailing Indian matrimonial laws and life (really lop sided, bad and needs to revised, rewritten).
I keep telling. People to at least go a couple of rounds at the Family courts. You will see more than 95% of devastating wives, always conspiring to entangle their husbands in criminal cases and inevitably, without fail, squeezing them (husbands) for unreasonably huge huge amounts of maintenance. They are always focused on amassing money and wealth. Even the husbands are made to pay the Court costs.
THE PAINFUL, RIDICULOUS, AND AGONIZING FACT IS THAT THE HUSBANDS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO GET THE DETAILS OF THEIR EXPENDITURES. THEY CAN NOT SEEK THE EXPLANATIONS(THOUGH THEY ARE THE PAYMASTERS!!!!!!!!! AND THEIR HARD EARNED MONEY CAN JUST GO LIKE THAT!!!!! WHAT A HORRIBLE RULE IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT A PARTIAL LAW IT IS!!!!!!!!
ON THE OTHER SIDE, THE WIFE CAN CALL FOR RECORDS, GO TO HER HUSBANDS’ WORK PLACE CREATE UGLY SCENES, FOR THIS WOMEN ARE LEFT UNPUNISHED.
Here is a typical judgment and case wherein the glaringly erring (criminal) wife has been let off without reason and rhyme.
WHAT A GREAT INJUSTICE TO MEN!!!!!!?????
Oh, HARASSED MEN AND SO CALLED ASSOCIATIONS PROTECTING THEM
RAISE AND AWAKEN, FIGHT IT OUT
I read with great interest the judgment of the HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION in FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 116 OF 2002 WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 47 OF 2007.
The said petition for cancellation of permanent alimony by the and also MA No.7/01 requesting the court to take action against the wife by lodging a complaint for the offences under sections 193, 182, 196, 199, 200 and 201 of IPC, as the respondent wife had given false evidences before the court in earlier proceedings. The family court had decreed FA No.77/01 and thereby cancelled the order of grant of permanent alimony from the date of filing of petition. The incidental relief claimed by the husband which is in the nature of direction for return of amount of
maintenance paid by the husband to the wife came to be rejected. The court also rejected the MA No.7/01 for taking action against the respondent wife for leading false evidence before the Court.
Thus the questions for determination which arises in these appeals are (i) as to whether the family court is justified in cancelling the order of grant of permanent alimony and in refusing to issue direction against the wife to return the amount of maintenance already received? (ii) Is the court justified in rejecting the request made by the husband to take action against the respondent wife for leading false evidence?
In COMMON SENSE the answer for the first question should be
(a) Cancellation of the order of grant of permanent alimony is right. It is a clearly proven fact that the wife has erred to the maximum extent possible and hence she should reap the fruits.
Regarding the second part of it, it is worth noting that the divorce has already happened. They are no more husband and wife. THEY WILL NOT HAVE (and they need not have also) any love, affection and/or soft corner for others. BECAUSE THEY ARE ALREADY PARTED. When the former wife (NOW AN ORDINARY WOMAN) can go to the extent of telling lies, misrepresenting and misleading the Court to derive undue benefits WHY action SHOULD be refused and rejected? If they were to be a happy husband and wife the problem would not have been there at all. With their mutual understanding it would have been settled. They would not have come to the Courts at all. When the aggrieved party himself complains, pin points the crimes of the opponent (I do not want to call wife or woman) and seeks relief how can he be denied relief? Will any other ordinary woman who has committed a crime will be let off just like that in other cases? Can it be done at the cost of men? IT IS A GREAT INJUSTICE TO MEN. The said judgment is anti-men. Isn’t it so? THIS MEANS TO SAY THAT ERRING WIVES (AND ALSO FORMER WIVES) ARE FREE TO DO ANYTHING. ALL THEIR CRIMES AND UNTRUTHFULNESS ARE HONORABLE AND UNPUNISHABLE ACCORDING TO THE PRESENT SET UP OF LAWS AND JUDGES.
Imagine a man in the place of that woman in the above case. What would have been the judgment? Definitely he would have been sent to jail. What a cruel paradox indeed.
It is conspicuous that both the Courts in the above case have been cruel to men. It has blatantly rejected the just pleas of the former husband. The Courts have been convinced about the crimes of the woman (wife). And that woman is not an ordinary, rural, uneducated one. She is quite opposite to all that. But the judgment is quite contradicting the common perception of justice. At least the Courts should have taken a positive step in upholding the already worn out statements of EQUALITY AND JUSTICE. I am sure that the first part of the judgment will be of less consequence for the criminal wives. THIS JUDGMENT IS SURE TO SEND WRONG SIGNALS. IT LEGALISES AND ENCOURAGES FURTHER MORE CRIMES AGAINST MEN/HUSBANDS.
PLEASE FIGHT IT OUT.
Mr. Arup sir,
Please let me know is there any wrong in husband asking for the details of the expenditure of her erring and litigating wife.
Why the Govt. or for the matter anybody who lends you money, you are accountable for it. You are supposed to pay taxes. In salaried class people the tax is deducted at the source itself.
But what about a woman. She knows only the gathering up of money. And spending them lavishly. But still the husband is banned from seeking the accounts or the details of her expenditure.
ISN'T IT TOO MUCH ON HUSBANDS? IS NOT A GREAT INSULT AND INJUSTICE TO THE HUSBANDS?
If a woman provides the details of her expenditure you can see:
a) Her extravaganza
b) Leading an enjoyable life even without the company of the husband and at the cost of that absent absent
c) Illegal and false accounting and so on
A working husband is supposed to account for even a single pie in his day to day life.
The husband is made to shed his hard earned money to her troubling wife. She can enjoy that money. To get that money she can call for records, documents and other relevant matter and materials.
But why can't a husband do it? Now a days, in most of the cases, the wives who are collecting (nor collecting LOOTING) lakhs and lakhs rupees from their helpless husbands, are indluging in various different kinds of activities like lending the money, investing in gambling, etc.
To have pinch of it and suffer from this I wish this to happen:
A wife of a Judge or a prominent political leader/law maker shoul go astray. She should entrap the Judge, that prominent political leader/law maker in matrimonial disputes. She should file false criminal cases against the above said persons, their parents, their relatives and friends. And all of them must be sent to jail at least for few hours. She should collect a huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge amount of maintenance but still ask for their salary slips, list of assets, properties including cycle, motor, almirahs, chairs and others through Courts. The sitting Judge, as usual, must grant a huge amount in the form of maintenance but should not allow the above persons to get the details of her expenditure.
Ho!! lo!!!!!!!!! then these people may raise. open their eyes to the realities. They may try to change the laws according the changed circumstances, lives and persons.
