S.313 crpc

Accused do not have to right to say to change the prosecution wittnesses. Accused can put on his own wittnesses for his case 

Cheque cases are won on technicals otherwise the guilt of accused in presumed.

When the  bank witness appeared at that time you should have taken objection, instead of production of accounts his cross must have been insisted.

Now if you call bank as witness it will go against you since whatever he will depose will be your admission.

Some clerk from the Bank came and filed the document, thats all, no affidavit and no oath. Now please tell what to do.

You are not advocate so this problem and same with many others who come on such sites.

The summons must have been for producion of accounts and so no afffidavit  or oath needed .

Dear Maru Sir,

So can I file application seeking more information from the bank before filing S.313 statement or I do the same after submitting s.313 statement ?

Generally nowadays Banks role is limited upto providing the requested document, unless and untill party examines the same specifically, in your case  even though complainant has put the names of bank in his witness list but they were not summoned as witness and process seems to be only the calling of documents.

Now if you want any additional document for your defense, you can also apply for the same once you are in your defense that is after S.313. If the document you wish to call is against you, then I do not know, otherwise nothing will go against you.