Ambycabin 08 September 2016
Sachin (N.A) 08 September 2016
Originally posted by : Ambycabin | ||
Hi Experts, Can anyone please comment on the possibility of getting arrested in fake 498a cases after SC judgement of 2014. Have the arrest reduced drastically or atleast no automatic arrests and people are getting time for Bail. New SC Jugment in 2014 have rrally brought up change? |
The judgement of SC is working as a sheild against unnecessary arrest and harrasment against all the sections in which maximum punishment is 7 years. But be alert. After that judgement taking AB from session court also became easier as every body wants peace of mind so people still taking AB
Ambycabin 08 September 2016
Thanks all for Feedback.
Ambycabin 08 September 2016
a) All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from Section 41, Cr.PC; b) All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub- clauses under Section 41(1)(b)(ii); c) The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention; d) The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorise detention; e) The decision not to arrest an accused, be forwarded to the Magistrate within two weeks from the date of the institution of the case with a copy to the Magistrate which may be extended by the Superintendent of police of the district for the reasons to be recorded in writing; f) Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing; g) Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction. h) Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court. i) We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine. j) We direct that a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Chief Secretaries as also the Director Generals of Police of all the State Governments and the Union Territories and the Registrar General of all the High Courts for onward transmission and ensuring its compliance.
Even After all of the above Judgements, Police arrest is possible? Just want to seek your views.
vaidyanathan (retired psu employee) 09 September 2016
No police in india will take any action unless such action results them as gravy train in the first place. Secondly no political, influenced bureaucrat are sitting on the police head again no acrtion. In nutshell police will take action in India only on stated two counts