LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Guest (Guest)     23 July 2009

Sebi amends equity-listing agreement

Market regulator Securities & Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has notified the amendment to the equity-listing agreement, prohibiting listed companies from issuing shares with superior rights with regards to voting or dividends for shares that are already listed.

The decision to prohibit listed companies from issuing shares with superior rights was taken at Sebi’s board meeting held on June 18, 2009, and the amended guidelines will come in to immediate effect.

For giving effect to the above decision, the regulator has inserted a new clause in the listing agreement which states, “The company agrees that it shall not issue shares in any manner which may confer on any person superior rights as to voting or dividend vis-a-vis the rights on equity shares that are already listed”.

The latest move by Sebi is intended to protect the interest of ordinary shareholders as there were few instances in the past where promoters have misused the provision by issuing shares with superior voting rights.

The regulator has earlier noted that if a listed company issues shares with differential rights (SWDR) with superior voting rights and that too through preferential issue to a select group of persons, this may become a tool in the hands of the promoters to increase their control and voting rights in the company by way of issuing SWDR with superior voting rights to themselves.

Currently, the pricing guidelines for preferential allotment and qualified institutional placement are applicable for shares with equal voting rights. As such, the regulator fears that a preferential or QIP issuance of SWDRs with superior voting rights would clearly benefit the allottee, which shall get shares carrying superior voting rights at the cost of equal voting rights shares. This will adversely affect the rights of other public shareholders. 

 



 2 Replies

Abhishek (Lawyer)     24 July 2009

Just to share one more thought, the ban is only on the companies who
already signed listing agreement to list their shares on particular
stock exchange (amendment is in listing agreement only). There is no
ban on a non-listed Public company. The ban only applies to them when
non listed public companies will sign the listing agreement to list
their shares on stock exchange. So such companies can issue shares
having superior voting rights before signing listing agreement. So
there may be possibility of having a category of shares at the time of
IPO that have superior voting/dividend rights. Thus, investors
subscribing to the IPO would be well aware of this category.

This circular indirectly prohibits inferior voting


rights too. the amendment reads as--



28A. "The company agrees that it shall not issue shares in any manner

which


may confer on any person, superior rights as to voting
or dividend vis-à-vis the rights on equity shares that are already
listed".

this means If company's  shares are listed on stock exchange (one


share one vote) and company issues inferior voting rights (5 shares


one vote). this is permitted.but after listing those shares on stock


exchange the company cannot issue shares (one share one vote) It can


only issue shares i.e. 5 shares having one vote only. As circular


clearly indicates "no issuance of shares having superior voting right


over the shares which are already listed". so it is indirectly


prohibits company to issue shares having inferior voting rights.

Guest (Guest)     24 July 2009

 true


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register