Dealing with a rare situation here........
Relevant citations at Bombay HC/SC wud sincerely be appreciated. (barring vague comments of gender bashers)
The Story goes as follows:
1. Husband filed for divorce/'mental cruelty' HMA.
2. Husband is very rich and in mid 40's. Wife nearly 40.
3. 16 year old marriage.
4. First Kid borned after 6 years of marriage
5. Wife underwent tubectomy (sterelisation operation) when kid was 7 years old. husband made her do it (but no proofs to prove the consent by husband)
6. Kid expired 2 yrs back, in a freak car accident at the age of 8, wife got away with minor injury.
7. Marital Dispute started since 1 year.
Wife blurted out about 'tubectomy' as emotional outburst (opponent ld. Councel made her to vomit that out to my utter shock) during 'interim stay' arguments in front of Hon Court.
Now Husband is taking advantage of this fact as if he was unaware of it!!
It wasn't there in the petition!!
It's gone futile to raise objection. Leave to amend petition granted to husband, O 6 R 17
How to salvage this?
Wife did it as a family planning.
Qs of any kind of deprivation to hubby shouldn't arise here.
There is a lot at stake.
Any citations in wife's favour?