Wife arrested with Lover for murder of husband-Biased Laws

Hello,

I don't want to comment but it shows that some kind of hatredness is going on in some section of the society. Thats needs to be pull out for its growth.

Divional attitude couldnot lead to anything

Are you so naive liberal.

Though you may like to brand everybody who opposes biased law in the adjective that will serve your purpose, but  the point author is making is  true to the core.

Currently women gets favorable treatment from law - I think favorable is a very mild word to describe what is happening.

In eyes of law men and women should be equal. Same number of charges should be applied to the murderer- be its man or woman. But currently if you see if a woman is murdered - sections like 302,498a, DV along with others are applied.

But if a man is murdered only section 302 is applied. -- that leaves us with question - whether woman life is more important than man?

Is current law not biased?

Actually, I am making the reply of authors 3 consistent queries which are relevant to each other . Its true that some discrimination is there when husband commit murder and was being tried for section 302, 498a, DV act. In fact when the muder has been committed on th e range of insufficent dowry or cruelty caused to spouse then only section needs to be implemented

I strongly oppose if there is cold blodded murder say under Love triangle then only section 302 may be tried

Its the law enforecement agencies who tried other sections such as 498a and DV in order to prove theri motive

Police/state too teied under section 120-B, 34 when 2-3 persons have the knowledge about the murder but may have not taken any step in killing the victim

The court acquits the person with charges under 498A & DV if nothing has come on records

Surely its biased law if some one is tried which has no relevance

Ms Liberal if you cannot comment properly don't make unwanted stements as other trouble with your version. Even the women LCI too disagree with your remarks. I think you are unable to take decisons and cannot give good advice. Its seems that you are not much experienced in dealing with the problems of the authors or members