1. Show both sides of the coin as politiolegal correct professment. For a Gender Researcher when ‘confronted’ each and every words of further repliers becomes “bulling” and /or “public forum abuse” and/or as a “personal attack” statement and it is a lame excuse to "end" a public platform debate hands up whereas all public replies were meant as a simple legal debate.
2. Absolutely.
3. Gender Researcher ever wondered why your started below message thread of
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Re-Food-for-thought-24324.asp
4. Any member may put as many citations / judgment as may be allowed by Admin / Partner but don't start the citation with a biased "quote" as is objected to Prabhakar's this post title. His contributing Judgment of Mumbai HC is OK to the extent it could be used by any deserving party accordingly, but, to put a quote in start of the citation is objection from one of the public member here.