LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


Poll Comments


Should the retirement age of the High Court Judges be increased from 62 yrs to 65yrs?

Yes 35 %
No 62 %
Can't say 3 %
Total Votes Cast : 109
Submitted By - Rahul Singh Read Comments

Previous | Comments | Submit Poll


Comments on !!!

Should the retirement age of the High Court Judges be increased from 62 yrs to 65yrs?
Posted by Roopsi

30/03/2011 15:31:06

no comments
 
Posted by udaycj udaycj

29/03/2011 14:40:33

Longevity/ Life expectancy is increasing in general. So retirement age should be increased in general to all categories to reflect this trend.
 
Posted by Parveen Kr. Aggarwal

28/03/2011 22:37:05

Instead of enhancement of the retirement age of Judges, there must be efforts to enhance the efficiency and 'litigant friendly' attitude of the Judges at all levels.
 
Posted by Parveen Kr. Aggarwal

28/03/2011 22:34:58

Instead of enhancement of the age of Judges, there must be efforts to enhance the efficiency and litigant friendly attitude of Judges at all levels.
 
Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali

28/03/2011 18:10:18

give to chance to seniority
 
Posted by jolly

28/03/2011 14:41:15

Dearth of good & experienced judges. humongous backlog of cases
 
Posted by Sanjeevappa. L

28/03/2011 11:04:19

no
 
Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN

28/03/2011 06:38:18

It is not much on matter of experience. But it is not good as they wont change their view
 
Posted by G.Nagarajeshwar Rao

27/03/2011 22:15:49

I agree with Mr.SANJAY DIXIT. In my opinion writ jurisdiction should be given to district courts also for rendering speedy justice and to facilitate general public at large.
 
Posted by SANJAY DIXIT

26/03/2011 23:22:07

According to population increase, according to pendency of cases and according to requirement of time; we need more number of courts with judicial officers with full efficiency. NO NEED TO INCREASE THE RETIREMENT AGE OF JUDGES OF ANY CADRE. (In my views it should be reduced to 60 years.). Instead transparency should be initiated in elevation of High Court Judges.
 
Posted by Bhartiya No. 1

26/03/2011 22:59:09

62 is even more than required rather it be 58, let some new young and dynamic justices to cone in.
 
Posted by Suchitra. S

26/03/2011 19:45:55

It is mentally strenuous job to be a judge though it looks lucrative. I feel 62 should be more than enough.
 
Posted by adv. rajeev ( rajoo )

26/03/2011 16:39:49

62 is more than sufficient. Let them take rest.
 
Posted by adv. rajeev ( rajoo )

26/03/2011 16:15:44

62 is more than sufficient. Let them take rest.
 

You need to be logged in to post comment