Is it fair for the non elected to hijack the parliament in current scenario ? |
|
| Yes | 51 % |
 |
|
| No | 45 % |
|
|
|
| Can't say | 4 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 95 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by sachin kadtan |
22/06/2011 10:50:17 |
| Issues raised by the Social Activist are true and correct, welfare of the society is most important, yeah i agree no body supreme to law. loopholes in legal provision are curse to democracy... | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
21/06/2011 22:11:14 |
| yes. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
21/06/2011 18:56:56 |
| Yes. | |
| Posted by Sh. P Suresh |
20/06/2011 19:57:30 |
| It is neither hijack, nor are the so called HELected absolute voice of common man. Corruption, graft, black money, non-accountability of so called pErmanent governMINT people has simply crossed all limits. It is the question of future of the nation. There should not be any dilution on such an important issue, lest we are demeaning the sacrifices made, being made of several millions of unseen, unsung, meaningful, honorable patriots. | |
| Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
20/06/2011 11:58:27 |
| yes | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
18/06/2011 13:48:29 |
| the phrasing of this poll is biased what do you mean "HIJACK THE PARLIAMENT". Use neutral wording. | |
| Posted by M. PIRAVI PERUMAL |
18/06/2011 10:32:25 |
| Parliament must have the final say it is Supreme. If the civil society want to change then they should get elected by the people. They cannot achieve the same simply with excessive media coverage. Through which will get and publicity and funds. | |
| Posted by Somnath Gangopadhyay |
17/06/2011 23:01:21 |
| The only motto seems to be of the non-elected is to get media attention and nothing else as anybody wants to fight against a democratically elected Government. | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
17/06/2011 21:45:35 |
| even this issue is bye passed by persons bye passed elections | |
| Posted by pradip shah |
17/06/2011 13:53:31 |
| Unelectable is in majority.They must have say on BLACK MONEY issue. | |
| Posted by Vikas Kumar |
16/06/2011 20:42:30 |
| it is a wrong question put to vote in my opinion as civil society is considered fourth pillar of democracy and work as pressure groups in all democratic nations of the world. They are part of public public are the real masters of the government in a democracy. These people are not snatching the right of Parliament to pass or sanction the legislation but only trying to exert that a good law is being drafted by the executive which is most potently helpful in fight against corruption.Putting that Parliament is being hijacked by doing so is totally a misconception spread by the government to divert the real issue. | |
| Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
16/06/2011 12:43:37 |
| i do agree | |
| Posted by adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) |
16/06/2011 05:32:02 |
| what the hell elected people are doing? They are selling our country for their satisfaction. | |
| Posted by sanjay kumar |
15/06/2011 12:08:15 |
| Democratic process has to follow the Constitution. The people have powers to elect their representatives in Lok-sabha and remove them whereever there are elections. Non-elected are free to make a public-opinion so that people can make a judicious decision for the next elections but the non-elected cannot anyway interfere in the working of the existing Parliament as such. | |
| Posted by Kul Bhushan |
15/06/2011 10:24:00 |
| In democracy plateform is parliament not streets.It is failure of opposition if issues are decided on the streets.It is not a question of elected or non elected. | |
| Posted by O.P.SHARMA Advocate |
15/06/2011 00:47:59 |
| Parliament is Supreme but failure in responsibilities Civil Society i.e.non elected make them to rise above and accept what is needed today.Current Scenario is mandate of the need and Parliament must welcome as representative of Civil Society. Important bills are sometime made public for opinion and suggestions are invited.Members of Parliament must forgo vested interests. O.P.SHARMA Advocate RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT,JAIPUR | |
| Posted by M N Shaikh |
15/06/2011 00:28:27 |
| can not be permitted because it is against constitution. | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
