Does the conditions of expired lease agreement applies?

Yes because conditions of lease agreement is violated by the tenant.  He has not informed before two months prior to the lease period is over.  So there is no wrong in the owner's action

Thanks Mr. Rajeev for your reply.

Is it means the conditions of expired agreement is applied in that cas?

If the tenant continues after expiry of the lease period, he will be regarded as the holding over tenant subject to the same terms and conditions of the expired lease deed. Pl see the TP ACt.

The transfer of Property says that after the agreement of lease is expired the tenant is continuing as tenant by holding over.  During this time his tenancy is over.  but he is holding over in the same terms and conditions as in the lease. 

But whether the condition of intimating 2 months prior to the vacation is applicable during the period of holding over is a point to be decided.  That condition is applicable where the tenant vacates the building during the contractual lease, that is he is cutting short the period of lease.

In my opinion a tenant who wants to stick to the agreement and wants to vacate the building on termination of lease period can do so with out any further notice because the agreement it self is notice.  In the agreement itself the termination date is speicified.

The law allows him to continue further as a legal tenant and then he acquires the status of tenant by holding over.  whrere the tenant does not wish to take advantage of that provision be penalised for that is a question to be answered.

I agree that the two months notice is for the tenant to vacate the premises during currency of the Lease. As holding over tenancy is on month to month basis the tenant will have to serve 15 days notice before vacating the premises. HE SHOULD NOT VACATE WITHOUT SERVING SUCH NOTICE.