LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Gangadhar (Sub Inspector of police)     16 October 2009

Fraud by notary

In Cr No 1101/2009 u/s 420 and 468 of ipc of ps SR Nagar, the accused has induced the complainant to sign on blank Rs 100/- non judicial stamp papers and some blank ledger papers and later on filled the type matter and created the documents that the complainant has sold his house property. The documents are not reegistered. Some of the signatures of the complainant are suspected to be forged. The accused has also notarised the some of the documents. Except on the first page, that too with in the matter of deeds there is no mention of dates either by parties or by notary. Whether the notary it is mandatory to put the date whenever he attests his signature and seal, if not what are the consequences?



Learning

 3 Replies

PJANARDHANA REDDY (ADVOCATE & DIRECTOR)     16 October 2009

NOTARY ACTS SAYS AND BINDS FOR THE VERIFICATION OF ALL THINGS BEFORE AUTHONTICATION, I.E ALL PARTIES INCLUDING WITNESSES.

BUT ACTUVALLY Rs. 25/- SOME/ MAJORITY  NOTATY SIGNS ANY WHERE

BHANU RASPUTRA (ADVOCATE & SOLICITOR divyatta.r@gmail.com)     18 October 2009

i  agree with mr. reddy. bhanu rasputra , soliciotr an dnotary from mumbai

Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar (Nil)     22 October 2009

putting date and time alongwith his signature is mandatory for the notary . otherwise the document can not be said to have been validly notarized.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register