LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

Is a registration mandatory - ancestral property

hi ,

when it comes to mutation vs registration for ancestral property, in the case of ancestral property that is 80 yrs old and no partition happend yet and still considered join in nature, does a mere mutation transfer to current legal holder names is ok for ownership claim or does it have to registerd.

some advise registration not required as it only within family and as long as mutation has all names listed, it should be fine. parties are not currently interested to go for partition.

is it true that regisration to be involved only if we decide to go for a partition wherein each partition has to be registerd??



Learning

 3 Replies

R.Ramachandran (Advocate)     05 February 2018

You say that parties are not currently interested to go for partition.

If that be so, then why suddenly ask whether Registration is required?  

 


(Guest)

thanks.
i have read somewhere that a mere mutation does not confer a title .and so just want to make sure if a registration is requried once a transfer is done to all legal heir names n case of this ancestral property in nature.we are a hindu family.

 

R.Ramachandran (Advocate)     05 February 2018

Please try to cross the bridge when you approach it.  Since no partition is taking place, your query is too premature.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading