LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Tarachand   22 June 2017

Pil for stopping contrary statements

Sirs/Madam

 

Highest Bidder purchased Flat from Bank in public auction sold in SARFAESI Act

 

Later on Highest Bidder found that there was stay order of Consumer Court  thereon

.

Hence Highest Bidder stopped paying Bank  balance auction  85%  amount and asked Bank to first vacate the stay order

 

But Bank threatened to cancel the auction-sale-letter if not paid within 15 days

 

Hence Highest Bidder  field RCS before CJJD

 

Bank filed Reply and admited that Highest Bidder stopped paying further installments and also the Bank is unable to sell Flat due to Stay Order  (Statement No.1 of Bank)

 

Highest Bidder then also filed Complaint u/s.420 of IPC before JMFC for selling him Flat without disclosing truth of stay-order of Consumer Court

 

Bank filed Reply before JMFC and said that due to Stay Order Bank stopped selling Flat to the Highest Bidder and hence being aggrived by such act of the Bank the Highest Bidder  filed this Complaint.  (Statement No.2 of Bank)

 

In the meanwhile, the RCS was declined for jurisdiction

 

And the Highest Bidder filed Appeal Misc Civil Appeal before District Court which is pending

 

Bank again admitted in Appeal (MCA) before District Court that Bank  reiterates its sale-confirmation-letter which was recevied by POA of the Highest Bidder. (Statement No.3 of Bank)

 

In other related case filed by original borrower before DRT,  the Bank filed Reply and said therein that because the sale-auction was conducted by POA of the Highest Bidder without giving proper copy thereof, hence the said sale is not valid and hence Bank refused to take balance auction amount from the said Highest Bidder.   (Statement No.4 of Bank)

 

In DRT Bank stated that because somebody trespass into the Flat hence the Bank cannot accept auction amount from Highest Bidder because the Highest Bidder is asking for peaceful possession of Flat against payment of auction amount   (Statement No.5 of Bank)

 

In Appeal before District Court, the Highest bidder tendered the blank cheque but Bank refused to accept by raising point of jurisdiction of District Court  by saying that Bank cannot accept auction amount from the said Highest Bidder because the Civil Court has no jurisdiction and the Bank has not mentioned truth of “trespass in Flat” before the District Court .  (Statement No.6 of Bank)

 

After 06 months the Bank filed application in District Court in MCA and prayed to put on records that the Bank cannot accept auction amount from the Highest Bidder  because the Highest Bidder  is  asking peaceful possession of Flat against payment of auction amount (Statement No.7 of Bank)

 

Thus,  the Bank is  making contradictory statements mainly in different Courts and when the Highest bidder pointed it out to Court, Court took no action and the Advocate of the Bank said we are big company having hundreds of Advocates and the bank is changing officers and hence such minor mistakes happen and the Advocate laughed at the Highest bidder

 

The Fact is that the price of the Flat increased sharply and the secretary of the scoiety where Flat is situated and the Recovery Officer of Bank both are brother and have muscle power, too

 

Cases are pending since 04 years while the Highest bidder tendered the blank cheque but Bank refused to accept by raising point of jurisdiction of District Court 

 

Hence it is request that

 

Tell how Highest bidder can approach High Court and pray the High Court to stop the Bank to not make contradictory statements in different Courts  and also their Advocates must be warned to indulge in such activities

 

Guide

HARIOM

HARIOM



Learning

 4 Replies

Ms.Usha Kapoor (CEO)     23 June 2017

Matter i spending inseveral courts. It is subjudice.We should wait till something or the other  these court s decide.  yoiu can file PIL also to stop the Bank from contradictory statements in various judicial forums/courts.

Ms.Usha Kapoor (CEO)     23 June 2017

Matter is pending in several courts. It is subjudice.We should wait till something or the other  these court s decide. yoiu can file PIL also to stop the Bank from contradictory statements in various judicial forums/courts.

Rama chary Rachakonda (Secunderabad/Telangana state Highcourt practice watsapp no.9989324294 )     23 June 2017

Higher bidder can file a case on bank under perjury sections of IPC.  time has come in India to strictly enforce the law relating to “perjury” or “false witness”, which would go a long way in future criminal cases. For a person’s statement on oath, testimony, and/or in sworn affidavit is regarded as truth (unless the contrary is established), are vital evidence on which judicial decisions are made.

Tarachand   25 June 2017

sir/madam ji

Actually I filed an application u/s. 340 of Cr P C in One Court but there is technical problem that Court is of the opinion that he made other statement which is in contrary to the previous statement in other Court and hence how this Court can sanction his complaint

and the same opinion is expecetd from the other Couirt

 

Hence, I asked whther a PIL or Writ or Appln can be filed in High Court to restrict them and also to restrict thier advocates for not supporting to them knowingly in  such offence of alternate perjury

Regard

Guide

HARION


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register