LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Shyflower Human   24 November 2024

Substitution of lrs if untraceable

In a suit filed for bonafide need under section 14(1)e of Delhi Rent Control Act, by me, the landlord was contested by the nephew of the tenant as SPA holder of his uncle- the Tenant- who was settled  abroad with his family . This nephew is in unauthorised possession of the premises, a shop.

However the Leave to Defend of the nephew was DECLINED by the court. Decree was passed against the tenant who was residing abroad throughout the litigation.

During the Execution proceedings, the JD- the tenant living abroad expired. His legal heirs all reside abroad. The news of  death of the JD was broken to the Delhi High Court during the Revision Petition filed by the SPA holder. ONLY the date of death of the JD has been disclosed in the last hearing in the High Court held on 20-11-24.

No death certificate has been placed on record before the High Court and neither the LRs substitution has been done. 

It is unlikely that it would be done either as the LRs are NOT cooperating with the nephew. The Revision Petition in the High Court is most likely to abate asLimitation period of 90 days is already over. The JD expired on 13-01-24 and they disclosed the fact of his death on 02-08-23 and his date of death on 20-11-24.

The High Court is not being kind to them for the delay in disclosing death and has told them to file appropriate application by the next date and told their advocate to file his vakaltnama on behalf of LRs. This is unlikely to happen.

In the last order, the High Court has granted no interim protection against execution proceedings and told the DH, that's me, to seek whatever relief I want from the Executing Court.

 

Now, the problem that I face is that I am unaware of the names and addresses of the LRs of the deceased JD. 

How do I do LRs substitution in case they are untraceable ?

Is my Execution of the decree going to abate if I fail to do LR substitution?

What happens to the nephew who is in unauthorised possession of the premises in case the Execution is abated?

Do I need to file another suit against the nephew who is actually a tresspasser in the eyes of law, to get back my possession?

One way that I have thought is to do LRs substituion by addressing the LRs as :

Mr. G(SURNAME), SON of late Sh. <JD'S NAME>

MRS. G( Surname), WIFE of laye Sh. < JD's name)

Address of the LRs is derived from the adress given on the SPA by the nephew and placed on record in LeaveTo Defend.

Please advise as to how to do LRs substitution as early as possible, as my limitation period of 90 days starts from 20-11-24 , the day they disclosed the  date of death of the JD to the High Court.

But how do I manage without the death certificate of the JD ? On the basis of their statement of date of death as reflected in the High Court's order ???

Please advise early .

 

With regards to all and thanks in advance



Learning

 5 Replies

Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate )     24 November 2024

Q Now, the problem that I face is that I am unaware of the names and addresses of the LRs of the deceased JD.  How do I do LRs substitution in case they are untraceable ? 

Ans: Since neither you are aware about LRs of deceased tenant nor intimated by the occupier of demised permises (cousin of LRs) the revision petition is liable to be abated / dismissed. 

Q Is my Execution of the decree going to abate if I fail to do LR substitution? 

Ans: No it (decree of possession)  shall not abate.

Q. What happens to the nephew who is in unauthorised possession of the premises in case the Execution is abated? Do I need to file another suit against the nephew who is actually a tresspasser in the eyes of law, to get back my possession?

Ans: The nephew is unauthorised occupant,  and it shall be executed in original decree / judgement against the deceased tenant. No other suit for his eviction is required to be filed.

Q. One way that I have thought is to do LRs substituion by addressing the LRs as : Mr. G(SURNAME), SON of late Sh. MRS. G( Surname), WIFE of laye Sh. < JD's name) Address of the LRs is derived from the adress given on the SPA by the nephew and placed on record in LeaveTo Defend.

Ans: Submit the address to executing court.

Q. Please advise as to how to do LRs substitution as early as possible, as my limitation period of 90 days starts from 20-11-24 , the day they disclosed the  date of death of the JD to the High Court. 

Ans: The revision is liable to be (shall be) abated / dismissed.

Q. But how do I manage without the death certificate of the JD ? On the basis of their statement of date of death as reflected in the High Court's order ???

Ans: The petitioner (SPA / Possessor of the property) is liable to proved death of the executant (grantor) of attorney.

Court shall proceed on the basis of evidence (of death) which is a bald statement of revisionist util proved.

Consult your lawyer who is well aware about facts and circumstances of the case besides the fact that s/he is an intelligent, competent, able and obliged/ duty bound to satisfy your question(s).  

1 Like

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     24 November 2024

Properly explained by senior learned Dr JC Vashista sir, I concur with his views

Shyflower Human   24 November 2024

Thank you so  much  Sh. Dr. JC VASIHTA SIR !!

Highly obliged.

Your reply clears the fog to a large extent.

 

 

P. Venu (Advocate)     24 November 2024

The facts, as posted, contradictory -

"However the Leave to Defend of the nephew was DECLINED by the court. Decree was passed against the tenant who was residing abroad throughout the litigation.

During the Execution proceedings, the JD- the tenant living abroad expired. His legal heirs all reside abroad. The news of  death of the JD was broken to the Delhi High Court during the Revision Petition filed by the SPA holder"

Admittedly, the court had declined  leave to the SPA holder (the nephew) to defend. If so, how is it that the SPA holder has filed the Revision Petition? 

Also, the nephew is in possession, may be unauthorisedly. Is he a defendant/respndent/JD in the proceedings?

Moreover, what are the provisions in the Delhi Rent Control Act as to inheritance of tenancy?

Shyflower Human   24 November 2024

Sir,

Since the Leave to Defend of the nephew was declined, he approached the High Court with a Revision Petition for that very reason  and to prove to the High Court that the trial court's order suffered from such and such infirmities and further to get a stay in the Execution proceedings.

On the face of it , it may seem contradictory but if you ponder over it and come to grasp the facts correctly, it is not.

 

The nephew who is in unauthorised possession was the SPA holder of his uncle, contested the Eviction Petition as his attorney vide the SPA and further filed Revision Petition in the High Court also in capacity as SPA.

He is not a defendent/respondent.

His uncle is the JD since the Eviction Petition can be filed against the TENANT and not a tresspasser or a person who is unauthorisedly occupying the premises.

In 2012, he was served a notice calling him an unauthorised occupant in the premises and was asked to vacate and handover possession to the landlady, that is my mother. Since my parents were ailing at that time I could not pursue the matter any further and soonafter my parents  expired one by one in the year 2013 and 2014. The property passed on to me vide Relinquishment Deed in 2013 after the death of my mother ( landlady).

In 2021, I filed the Eviction Petition.

In the meantime, this nephew got himself various receipts from different govt. departments, such as house tax, Trade License etc to claim he was in possession and further created a handwritten "Receipt" cum NOC cum Extension of Lease for "99" years and forged my parents signature on it. That purported handwritten receipt talks of having given 20 lakhs in cash to the landlady and the tenancy having been transferred to the nephew by his uncle before moving abroad.

We have outrightly denied any such receipt being ever issued by my mother in response to the Leave to Defend and have vehemently claimed it to be a forged and fabricated document.

The Rent Controller in his Judgement order has dealt with this issue as:  ... even if it is presumed to be true, then also such a receipt does not detract from the Landlord Tenant relationship that needs to be established for bonafide need case.

And as for the forged and fabricated document , the Rent Controller has said in the Judgement Order that the issue of forgery does not fall in his domain and the concerned parties should approach the "appropriate forum".

Two days prior to the Judgement Order, I had filed a police complaint against the tenant ( residing abroad and being alive then), the SPA holder and his brother who signed as witness on the purported handwritten receipt, for forgery and sought an FIR to be registered against them u/s 420,468, 471, 120(B).

The SPA holder being an influential person used his clout to hush up the matter with the police . Consequently, the IO refused to investigate the complaint , and told me so, citing the jurisdictional issue. According to the IO the crime took place where the court was situated and it fell outside their jurisdiction 

It is assumed the report filed by him , gives the status of complaint as: NI ( NOT INVESTIGATED) for the fake issue of jurisdiction.

Complaint was escalated to the DCP office but still not investigated and the IO closed the complaint and sent me computer generated message that the report concerning my complaint has been sent to the concerned office. That was the last I heard of the matter.

In the meanwhile, I being busy in Execution and High Court could not attend to the criminal matter.

Now, the SPA holder has approached the High Court with the same forged and fabricated "handwritten" receipt that "extends" his tenancy for a further "99" years !

Imagine, a handwritten, UNREGISTERED LEASE for 99 years  being brought as evidence in a court of law !!

He is claiming to have become a tenant in his own capacity on the basis of such a receipt.

And for this reason says that we did not implead the correct party in the Eviction Petition.

So far, his Revision Petition in the High Court is at the stage of Admission only.

No notice has been served as yet upon us by the High Court . 

Since we had filed a caveat in the High Court and were following the proceedings through VC, we  were aware of what's going on.

It is only on 20-11-24 that we marked our presence in the High Court for the first time. And that is the day they disclosed the date of death of the JD.

In the meantime, we are also attending the Execution proceedings wherein the SPA holder , again filed OBJECTIONS under ORDER 21, RULE 97, 101,105 etc,  this time in  independent capacity.

The same person who contested the Eviction Petition as SPA holder, filed OBJECTIONS in execution court after he gave resistance to the Bailiff by keeping the shop closed on the day he came for Execution of Warrants of Possession. Since no permission to break open locks was given and neither was police aid provided, we  had to file again for warrant of possession to be issued this time with permission to break open locks and police aid being provided ( such request in the first instance was not granted by the Rent Controller).

But before that could be granted, the SPA holder, masquerading as OBJECTOR in "Independent Capacity" filed the Objections under Order 21 Rule 97,101,105 etc. to frustrate the Execution.

Now, unless these get decided first , we cannot be granted fresh Warrants of Possession.

The objections were filed LAST YEAR in Oct 2023, and in between their lawyer got adjornment after adjornment on one pretext or the other and kept dragging the matter by not appearing in the court. Thus the Execution matter was stalled for full one year WITHOUT any effective hearing taking place. In between the Roster changed twice and finally a third Judge took the bench.

Finally, when LAST opportunity was given to them to come forward and argue on their objections, they finally did on 22-11-24.

Thus, their Lawyer used every trick in the book to successfully stall Execution proceedings for one year !

Such are the convoluted ways of laws !!

As for the High Court matter, I have given the details in my query.

I hope that clarifies the facts to you.

 

Thanks for your time and interest.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register