LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

A Difficult Judgment... Kind attention Lawyers, Judges !!

Page no : 2

Payel Nandi (LAW STUDENT)     10 January 2010

very good!!

RAJ KISHORE VAISH (TEACHER CITIZEN OF INDIA)     17 January 2010

HON'BLE CITIZEN'S

                  GET THE COPY OF JUDGEMEMT PASSED BY SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN THE CONTEMPT PITITION NO.203 OF 1996 IN THE MATTER OF RAJ KISHORE VAISH  V/S THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIA AND OTHERS(FEW JUDGES OF HIGH COURT) DO ANY CRIME , ANY CORRUPTION  NOBODY CAN PUNISH YOU TILL THE ABOVE NOTED JUDGEMENT IS LIVE  ...........IN INDIA.

                            RAJ KISHORE VAISH

Gulshan Tanwar (Advocate)     17 January 2010

Atleast there is someone who can ease the daily tensions of professional and personal life :)

Niikhil C. Shirgaonkar (Self Employed)     20 May 2010

Nice One!

R.Ranganathan (Advocate)     12 September 2010

I feel no need of appreciating anything in this matter. There cannot be any such incident at all. It must be a concocted and self made one. Further it is affecting the religious sentiments, the courts and the judges personally. Such type of matters should not be allowed to discussed in this forum. So Admin take care that such matters are deleted immediately.

For ex: This can be further intensified by fanatics like in place of "temple" some other words can be inserted and taken up affecting other religions. But the author of this thread has thought it otherwise thinking that this will not affect anybody. Further courts do no entertain such type of cases without any cause of action which is to be clearly stated and proved, even before numbering of the cases. So at the first instance itself this case will not come to court on the grounds stated in the thread.

I request Mr. CA CS Prakash not to create any ill feelings and play with the religious sentiments. He may not be following any religion but he should respect others sentiments.  


(Guest)

"Really good "

ghansham das (self employed engineer)     25 March 2011

Dea Mr Prakash Somani, CA.CS.

 

Can you pls guide,  comment In NiAct-138,r/w 141, ,142, intervention of Hi court u/s 482, before trial , is valid intervantion? After Session rejected Appln,  if so how?

 what penalty or compensation can be called from accused/ courts/ system; law ministry , govt. [ agree today there is nil govt . in functionory ] as a complainant had suffered a lot >

Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Advocacy)     27 March 2011

realy strange! ameging!

unviliebeble!

when ever judge's brain  connect with their heart such type of judgement will comes out!


(Guest)

Good one

G.Nagarajeshwar Rao (Advocate)     02 June 2011

Amazing! Though it is unbelievable, such type of postings ease the busy persons like advocates, while reading this mail.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register