LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sandeep Singh (Senior Area Manager)     10 March 2011

Evidence by Plaintiffs in the guise of Defendants

Plantiff A has filed civil case (property dispute) against defendant B and C where Defendant C is in fact Plaintiff in the guise of defendant (collusive defendant)

Since Defendant C has fully admitted the plaint, hence collusion of Defendant C with Plaintiff A is on record.

No issues have been framed wrt Plaintiff A and Defendant C.

Plaintiff A has been Cross Examined by Defendant B,hence evidence of Plaintiff is over.

Defendants B and C are yet to be Cross Examined by Plaintiff A

Now Plaintiff A wants to cover up the lacuna left out in his own Evidence through Evidence of Defendant C.

Defendant B feels objects to giving Evidence of  Defendant C on following grounds:

1.Since Evidence of Plaintiff A is over,A wants to cover up the lacuna by proxy through Evidence of Defendant C which will definitely cause prejudice and harm interest of Defendant B.

2.Since No issue have been framed between Defendant C and Plaintiff A, evidence of C is not required.

3.Defendant B has not replied to Written Statement of Defendant C.

4.Order XV Rule 1 & 2 supports Defendant B.

Whether the stand taken by Defendant B is correct as per law needs to be discussed.

 

 



Learning

 1 Replies

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE )     10 March 2011

Try to cross by solid evidence.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register