To make a compelling prayer for review::::
This is in regards to important evidence which wasn't filed on time after the exercise of due diligence (O 47 rule 1)before the order passed, also more time also wan't aksed to file that.
What is the extent of due diligence?
What are some legally justifiable excuses for not having produced such evidence at the time of trial?
Please help!!!!
I want to argue that "Respondent should not be bound by his failure to produce evidence at the time of trial and order........for the reason that the Petitioner herself knew the facts, but she approached court with unclean hands and with half truth.
The primary responsibility lies with the Petitioner to tell the truth and conplete truth.
