dear members'
the citation is reproded as under------'the question as to whether the claim of accused that the act done during the performance of his official duty was reasonable one and neither pretended nor fanciful ,can be examined during the course of trial by giving opportunity to the defence to establish it. Sudhir Kumar v G. Laxman 2005 Cri L J4173(KANT) ;2006 AIRBomR85N'----- with this position of law whenever magistrate taken cognizance and passed order that sanction not necessary u/s 197 so far the present case is concerned . and issued process.accused appeared before the court at this juncture can high court interfare against the order of magistrate in criminal revision?
