I am a shareholder of a co-op. bank in Pune.I was also an ex-employee of that bank. The bank had retired us at the age of 55 instead of 58.So we have lodged a writ petition in Aurangabad court.But after that our advocate had chosen to withdrw the petition and advised us to lodge it in Mumbai high court.The judge has agreed our request and given liberty to approach appropriate court.After that I have given a letter to the bank regarding the resolution of 1979 in which officers age was fixed as 58.From that resolution to 2003 nearly 24 years every officer was retiring at the age of 58 .Suddenly bank had made a resolution to decrease the age of retirement by three years means it come up to 55. When the case was withdrawn by us from Aurangabad court .I wrote a letter to the bank and demanded two resolutions in capacity of shareholder and also demanded the criteria used for determining the maturity date of security deposit taken by us which was upto 58 years.When I wrote the letter the case was already withdrwan from high court and we have not approached to any court yet.stiil bank has given denial to give me information giving reason that the case is in court.I wonder when the case is already withdrawn by us ,why the bank is saying that the case is in court? and further it quoted me not to write again on this issue and said it will not answer to my query.Now my question is how should I write a letter to the bank in capacity of shareholder and in capacity of ex-employee? or whether I should remain standstill for the time being and when we lodge a writ petition in mumabi high court then our advt. will produce this letter to court? What remedy you suggest?
