LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

prasad aggarwal (CA)     11 July 2015

Skipped SC direction

Wife filed RCR petition and an application for interim maintenance u/s 24 HMA.

 

The trial Judge in the Lower Court ignored the SC direction that every Court must assess the feasibility of possible re-union of husband and wife through the process of meditation and the litigation must start only after a failed meditation.

 

What do I do in this case now? The trial already started without pre-litigation meditation. I anticipated that the Judge would exercise a meditation first.

 

The opposite side laywer was eager to start proceedings because he could earn money through the grant of the application in wife's favour for litigation expenses.

 

Advise needed!

 

 

 

 



Learning

 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register