Anonymous
08 November 2009 at 12:53
I am a final year student of law going to complete law shortly. I am already doing business as a proprietor and a managing director of a firm. In future can I represent the cases involved with my firm and also practise law for others. ?
anitas
08 November 2009 at 12:51
I am a final year student of law going to complete law shortly. I am already doing business as a proprietor and a managing director of a firm. In future can I represent the cases involved with my firm and also practise law for others. ?
Anonymous
08 November 2009 at 07:59
hello,sir good morning,this is jiten.ahuja from ahmedabad, you know our property related litigation filed on 2006 in citi civil court, but in 3-4 years still one hearing is not happen,still is pending, respodent of this case is above 72 yrs, and she is my grand mother, so according to you what should i have to do,case no is 624/06- if you do something for me then i m very thankful to you, thanks.
varun kathuria
07 November 2009 at 23:38
i am insured with bajaj allianz life insurance company under Unit linked investment plan. According to plan i can make partial withdrawal and the same has been done by me on 20/10/09 and the company procedure was fulfilled on 21/10/09. According to the company rules payment shall reached the customer within 15 days of process. now after 15 days the payment has been not reached to me. and they are asking for 10 days more to reach the payment to me. when i asked the reason for the delay they reverted me back by saying that there was technical error in their system and for that they were disabled to make the payment. NOW my question is that whether i can file a complaint regarding this delay to district forum and what would be the reason for compensation if i will file a complaint against the company. please help me.......
Anonymous
07 November 2009 at 21:59
Does a foreign company require NOC/permission /licence /permit etc for purchasing 49% shares of an Indian power sector company under FEMA or any other law ?
mahendra rai jain
07 November 2009 at 20:58
I had taken a Broadband Connection from a company and give it a Rs. 20,000/- as non refundable amt. At the time of Demo the service was very fast but after insatallation of the same that became very slow and i was facing many problem with the service like non compliance of grivences in time, slow speed, frequently disconnection etc.... at last I had wind up that connection... and instituted a case u/s 12 consumer protection act. So that my problem is this should I demand non refundable amount (I have signed a document regarding this) because of deficiancy of service. Is thare any case law??
A.V.S.Subramanyam
07 November 2009 at 14:44
A Bank sanctioned a loan to a multinational company. However the loan was not released as certain sanction terms were not complied with by the Company. The company is doing business for commercial purpose.
In such event whether a consumer complaint be maintained against the Bank by the Company. Pls furnish any decisions that the company cannot maintain a compalaint.
Anonymous
07 November 2009 at 14:18
A Bank sanctioned a loan to a multinational company. However the loan was not released as certain sanction terms were not complied with by the Company. The company is doing business for commercial purpose.
In such event whether a consumer complaint be maintained against the Bank by the Company. Pls furnish any decisions that the company cannot maintain a compalaint.
Anonymous
07 November 2009 at 12:26
A pvt. ltd. investment Co. has issued pref. shares and necessary stamp duty has been paid on issue of the share certificate. The Pref. shareholders have now decided to convert the said pref. shares into equity shares . Question can now arise is whether stamp duty is reqd. to be paid on new share certificate that will be issued on conversion of pref. shares for which the stamp duty was already paid.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
deficiency in service
I took home loan from a NBFC. Tehy were hand in gloves with the builders. Did not inspect and made a bogus valuation report.
Now Municipality issued demolition order for 100% deviation in FSI. O.P says no violation was noticed during their inspection. Mine is a flat in third floor and if no violation found during inspection, it is not possible to build extra portions without edifice.Please advise if it amounts to deficiency in service.Can anybody advise me as to any precedent etc available. Thanks.