LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ASHWANI GAGNEJA   17 July 2009 at 13:18

PARTNERSHIP NOT LEGAL ENTITY

WHEN PARTNERSHIP IS NOT A LEGAL ENTITY, THEN WHY IN THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, THE FIRM HAS TO BE REGISTERED WITH REGISTRAR OF FIRMS FOR FILING A LEGAL SUITE. WILL APPRECIATE, IF SOMEONE PROVIDES ME A QUOTE FROM ANY JUDGEMENT BY ANY HIGH OR SUPREME COURT IN THIS REGARD.

ganesh   17 July 2009 at 11:45

defamation suit for malicious legal notice???

halo seniors,
a legal notice was sent to my friend which was out of jealous and malicious intention, can we take it as a libel and file a suit for defamation on that person (not on the lawyer who sent the notice) ??? on what grounds we can get compensation, pls explain with available C/L

tusharcosmic   17 July 2009 at 01:42

Can I recover loan by blank checks signed in 02 by borrower?

Can someone file a Court case by filling up the blank cheques and pronotes which were signed in 2002 ?
I used to lend money to a friend of mine on 2% of monthly interest. He issued me two blank cheques and a blank pronote, receipt etc in 2002.Since 2002 he is dealing with me, he used to repay and re-borrow. All the pronote etc. are duly signed and thumb impressed by his wife also as a witness.

Now he has stopped paying me anything since last 4 months.

When I demanded my money back, he said that he won’t and I can’t do anything against him legally as it is illegal to get blank or semi blank documents or cheques signed from any one, so I will have to fill up the dates and other particulars in cheques and pronotes and if I will fill the particulars today, it could be very easily detected by forensic science that cheques and pronotes were signed years before filling up the other particulars i.e. date of issuing the cheque and the amount of the cheque. So the court will immediately decline my case.
But one advocate suggested to me that this plea taken by him will not be accepted by court because even if he has signed the blank documents that means he accepted that whatsoever amount or date will be filled up in these documents and cheques will be acceptable to him. In other words even if it is proved by forensic report that cheques and pronotes were filled up years after signing these documents, I will not be at any loss in the eyes of Law.
Who is right –my defaulter borrower or that Advocate whom I consulted?
Please help. It is urgent for me.

tusharcosmic   17 July 2009 at 01:32

Tackle my Difficulty in recovery even after getting cheques?

Can't I recover money even if I have cheques/pronotes of my borrowers-please read full story answer then only?
I used to lend money to a friend of mine on 2% of monthly interest. He issued me two blank cheques and a blank pronote, receipt etc in 2002.Since 2002 he is dealing with me, he used to repay and re-borrow. All the pronotes are duly signed and thumb impressed by his wife also as a witness.

Now he has stopped paying me anything since last 4 months.

When I demanded my money back, he said that he won’t and I can’t do anything against him legally as he has reported 4 months back the local police station that he and his wife were sitting with Mr.“X” in a car and signed two cheques and pronotes etc. for Mr. X because he was about to borrow some money from X .At once some armed persons attacked them along with some cash and gold, they looted the cheques and pronotes etc also. And he said that he has given the same report to the bank also whose cheques these were.

And now if I will use these cheques and pronotes I will be at loss. I will be considered a criminal who some how was involved in that loot and now trying to further cheat him by using those cheques and pronotes etc.

Where do I stand legally? I s there any way out for me recover my money? Plz. help. Thanx in advance.

srinivasan   16 July 2009 at 20:05

Partition of jointfamily business and property

In a hindu jointfamily the father dies interstate, thear are two sons,three daughter and widow mother.How is the share divided among the sons/daughters and the widow mother.Under hindu suesission act 2005.Sir please guid me in sharing the property.

J. P. Shah   16 July 2009 at 19:25

RTI UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

In June 2009 NCDRC has decided that RTI applicant is a consumer under CP Act in the matter of S P Thirumala Rao, a consultant physician of Mysore vs. the Municipal Commissioner, Mysore City Municipal Corporation (MCC).

Despite my best efforts I could not locate judgement of NCDRC.

I shall be obliged to have copy of it, if some one can post on this portal.

maynami   16 July 2009 at 15:55

Money lended against cheques and bond execution

Hi
My wife who is a Govt employee lended money to a muslim women in their locality, she has given cheques against it,executed bond on stamp paper for repayment schedule and a Plot paper Of(her brothers) as surety.
Her husband has executed the bond, and gave signed cheques for their liability stating that they would return the money in two months. when agreed time of 2 month is over they are not giving the money and going on postponing the date but still now even after 6 month we have not received even a single pie from them.
I request you to please suggest me how to take a legal action against them. is this a civil case or criminal case. How do i proceed can i lodge a civil suite/attachment against them or should i reach police for intentionally inducing me

mahesh   16 July 2009 at 11:32

Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Hai all

the question is

"can an agreement or a document be impounded by the judge in the proceedings under section 11 of the Abitration and conciliation act 1996"

if the same is permissable any judgment to that effect.

Thank you

sanjeev murthy desai   16 July 2009 at 11:27

Documents execution in Jail

Hi friends.

1. Have any rights to prisons for execute the documents in Jail?

2. What are the procedures?

Thanks in advance. Have a great mansoon days.




Narasimha swamy N   14 July 2009 at 20:54

Mortgage

is there a time limit to file a suit for redemption to redeem the suit property.can it be filed even after 30 years as specified in Limitation Act?