ganesh
27 August 2009 at 15:20
I am residing in Bangalore. Few flat owners in my apartment got undervaluation notice. The flats are registered on 2007 and 2008.
http://www.hindu.com/2006/06/29/stories/2006062920250300.htm
This article describes that this undervaluation is done to collect bribe.
Could anyone give more information on this.
Regards
Ganesh
sivakumar
27 August 2009 at 10:10
What are the implications of judgement of honourable supreme court that DRT is not a civil court sivakumar
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
27 August 2009 at 00:11
hello all learned experts
i would like to know the stages of the cases of highcourt like civil appeal from order,civil appeal from stamp number,civil application sca &sca br civil application stamp number,civil revision application,civil revision application stamp number,cross objection,caveat,first appeal,misc.contempt application,second appeal,special civil application
Biplab Swain
26 August 2009 at 23:38
I have a jurisdiction hearing in Orissa HC on 01/09/2009.
Pls. Consider this Scenario:
A company has its HO at Delhi and Employs employees there. However, in the age of Internet, asks the Staff to work from Home at Orissa during his leave. Now there are trails of Email suggesting that the employee was doing office job during his leave at Orissa. Moreover, the staff also works remotely (From Delhi/Orissa/Mumbai as the case maybe) in Germany, UK & USA.
Now the question is in cases of Labour disputes:
1. What would be the Jurisdiction for the Job done during the Stay at Orissa.
2. Does the law accept Email/Internet as valid mode of communications(I recall that somebody during a seminar of Data safety did hint at the same through some ammendments in 2000)
3. We can prove the geographical origin of emails but will the suffice to fight for jurisdiction, when presented with circumstancial evidences?
Adinath@Avinash Patil
26 August 2009 at 22:12
Is all interium order are interlocatory order?
saket sagar
26 August 2009 at 17:45
sir,i want to know that how i can go through on this topic 'benami transaction and its validity in law of contract'.please mail me the full details of it on sagar.sak15@gmail.com.please also tell some cases on this topic.if you have full material please gude me on this topic.
thank you
shivraj
25 August 2009 at 21:29
The matter has been remanded if any defendant in the original suit is not a necessary party at all then on this stage can we ask to delete him? What is the procedure if we want to delete him from the suit when it is remanded?
poonam mathur
25 August 2009 at 18:29
WHETHER OBJECTIONS REGARDING IMPROPER SERVICE CAN BE RAISED BEFORE FIRST APPELLATE COURT IN THE APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96(2) OF C.P.C AGAINST EXPARTE DECREE
IF YES THEN UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES
poonam mathur
25 August 2009 at 18:26
WHETHER OBJECTIONS REGARDING IMPROPER SERVICE CAN BE RAISED BEFORE FIRST APPELLATE COURT IN THE APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96(2) OF C.P.C AGAINST EXPARTE DECREE
IF YES THEN UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
citation of 138 case
There was some authority where it was held complainants presence for each hearing for 138 case filed on behalf of company are no longer required as published in some news paper. Can anyone provide the details of the citations or any other authorities in this regards.
Thanks.