VJ Saravanan
03 June 2008 at 23:03
On 25.5.2008 I have taken a ticket in Indian railways via internet in Kanyakumari express which gave me waiting list number 89 after receiving the e-payment. But when i traveled TTR told that it is invalid ticket and you are not allowed to travel in this train because now you are in status of ticket less travel and pay penalty of Rs.610 and moreover he showed me the name list chart that waiting list number 89 contains other person's name and not your name.
Immediately I rose a question that how could one number of waiting list can be given to two people and why there is no link for waiting list which is taken via internet and manual. So mistake is emerged from your side so I told him that I will pay the penalty of Rs.610 but you give in writing that this e ticket is invalid ticket and I will see the rest but he refused to do so. And after long time he came back and told to my father that you need not pay Rs.610 penalty instead you take another ticket of Rs.286 in the forthcoming station. And father also done the same.
But now I am not at all satisfied with the solution given by the TTR because he made me to ashamed in front of others by saying that you are traveling without ticket. I am retaining that e ticket and another ticket which he asked take to my father. Can I lodge a complaint regarding this issue and I am I eligible for any claim or compensation if I approach consumer court for this issue. Please advise me in this regard.
dkm_2k
03 June 2008 at 22:48
My wife could not go to office because of illness during her pregnancy from October 2007. Doctor strictly advised bed-rest on account of previous miscarriage and present conditions. She informed the same to office in timely manner. The boss asked to give leave in one shot and not in months' durations. Doctor told rest is actually needed as the pregnancy is high risk and gave a certificate in one shot. The same was intimated with an indication that maternity leave will be applied at the required time. She applied leave well in time and there was no response of communication. She delivered the baby in the meanwhile which was informed by me to her boss by email. Later the leave was approved conditionally saying the approval is pending her joining back. She shall join back in November 2008. Is it correct on part of the employer to hold the benefit giving such a reason. Is it not against the law under which women are protected? Employer says that they can terminate her services without giving any benefit and they do not believe in any medical certifiate. The certificates are from treating doctor (Central Govt. Health Scheme Dispensary). What best can be done in order to come out of the situation? If my wife is unable to join back, can the company refuse her benefit? Shall we take legal help now or later? We shall be having a strong stand later? The employer has yet not refused but conditionally approved leave and told they will be approved after her joining back only. Kindly help if somebody can. Thanks in advance.
JYOTI TANWAR RATHORE
03 June 2008 at 22:18
my friend is working as collection manager he wants to pursue a law course which could help him in his job .pls suggest any suitable course .
kumar sachin
03 June 2008 at 18:11
can s statement made in a bail application, filed on behalf of the accused, be used as an evidence against him, specially when the accused has refused that he had instructed his lawyer for the same and his lawyer and the pairvikaar also deposed that the statement made in the bail petition were given without the consent from the accused.
dareson
03 June 2008 at 17:27
How many persons are needed to form an 'Association'? Is registration mandatory? what is the fees for registration at Tamil Nadu?
Thanks.
Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A
03 June 2008 at 17:10
HI
HOW TO STOP THE FOREST OFFICERS TO PLANT TREES ON SHAMLAT DEH IN THE OWNERSHIP OF GRAM PANCHAYAT IN THE POSSESION OF VILLEGERS IN HARYANA, AGAINST THE WILL OF GRAM PANCHAYAT. PLZ REFFER LAWS AND HOW TO SENT LEGAL NOTICE TO THE FOREST DEPARTMENT OF THE INTENTION OF GRAM PANCHAYAT. UNDER VILLAGE COMMON LANDS ACT
Member (Account Deleted)
03 June 2008 at 17:10
I have a property whic I am using for residential purpose for the last 30 years. Now it has become amain road, and the Common Development Plan allows me to use the property for commercial purpose.
What is the procedure to bifurcate the property if I want to retain a small portion for residential use and the rest for commercial use.
Is Declartaion of the intent sufficient.
The matter pertains to Karnataka, and Bangalore in particular.
navaneeta
03 June 2008 at 14:53
Can someone please tell me where I can find material on roundtripping?
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
03 June 2008 at 14:41
- Addition of a party - Suit for specific performance - A stranger or a third party to the contract, claiming to have an independent title and possession over the contracted property is entitled to be added as a party in the suit?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Legal Process Outsourcing
Respected Sir,
Myself Surya Pratap doing 5 year LL.B.
I want to know about LPO's future in India & the ways to develop my knowledge in this field. I m in 4th year now.
Kindly tell me the subjects on which a person should have a command for LPO.
Thanking You
Surya Pratap